The Supreme Court upheld Naima Khatoon’s appointment as AMU’s first woman Vice-Chancellor, dismissing a challenge over alleged conflict of interest. The Allahabad High Court had earlier cleared her selection.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the dismissal of Civil Judge Pradeep Synghal for serious misconduct, describing him as a “mere puppet” in criminal cases filed by acquaintances. He failed to follow legal procedures, misused his authority, intimidated staff, and the court found substantial evidence against him, rejecting his defense.
Today, On 10th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a plea challenging the reduction in JEE Advanced attempts, emphasizing that commitments made to students cannot be arbitrarily retracted. However, the court provided relief to candidates who dropped out between November 5 and November 18, 2024, by permitting them to register for the exam. The decision balances adherence to policy with fairness for affected students.
The Varanasi Fast Track Court dismissed the Hindu side’s plea for a new ASI survey of the Gyanvapi complex, as per Advocate Rastogi’s petition. Previously, an ASI survey detected historical artifacts amid claims that a mosque was built over a Hindu temple. Rastogi is considering appealing the decision.
The Delhi High Court ordered the Centre to release Rs 10 crores to AIIMS Delhi within three days for the treatment of children with rare diseases, emphasizing the importance of ongoing care. Failure to comply will necessitate the attendance of the Union Health Ministry’s Joint Secretary at the next hearing.
The Supreme Court of India affirmed the constitutional validity of the 10th Schedule, or Anti-Defection Law, originally introduced in 1985, dismissing a plea challenging it. The Court reiterated that the law prevents political instability by disqualifying members who switch parties, thereby upholding parliamentary democracy and accountability.
The Supreme Court today rejected a petition for nationwide virtual hearing facilities in district courts, citing the impracticality of one-size-fits-all directives due to the country’s vast size and complexity. The Court emphasized the ongoing e-Courts project and the need to trust High Courts to address technical challenges. The plea for evening courts was also dismissed due to potential opposition from lawyers.
The Supreme Court today dismissed a plea seeking permission for detained politicians to campaign virtually during elections, upholding the Delhi High Court’s decision. The bench criticized the petition for targeting a specific politician and noted “mala fide intent.” The plea, filed in the public interest, was considered unnecessary, with the High Court warning of potential risks if such provision were allowed.
