Today, On 3rd November, The Supreme Court declined to entertain a plea seeking a nationwide ban on social media use by children aged 14–18. CJI BR Gavai remarked, “Do you know what happened when Nepal tried such a ban? Anyway, thank you.”
The Delhi High Court refused to stop the release of “The Taj Story”, criticizing the poorly prepared PIL and noting that artistic expression cannot be curtailed. The Bench said the petitioner may approach the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act.
The Delhi High Court refused to issue directions on a plea seeking appointment of minorities other than Muslims and Sikhs as NCM head, allowing the petitioner to approach the Central government instead. The Court said the law only requires members to belong to minority communities, not any particular one.
A retired Delhi Public School teacher has moved the Delhi High Court challenging laws that prohibit teachers from giving private tuitions, calling the ban “unreasonable.” The Court will hear the matter next on November 12.
A PIL has been filed in the Delhi High Court seeking to halt the release of The Taj Story, alleging it spreads false historical claims and threatens communal harmony. The court will hear the matter tomorrow, ahead of the film’s October 31 release.
The Supreme Court has transferred a PIL on the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The NHRC will now oversee compliance to protect the rights and dignity of persons with mental illnesses across India.
In a major setback to actor Mohanlal, the Kerala High Court ruled that his ivory ownership certificates were void and unenforceable under the Wildlife Protection Act. The Court said the State failed to meet legal requirements before granting him ownership of the tusks and artefacts.
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a comprehensive regulatory framework for Artificial Intelligence tools in India. The petition emphasizes urgent action to curb deepfakes and protect individuals from impersonation.
Today, On 13th October, The Supreme Court rejected a PIL seeking an SIT probe into Rahul Gandhi’s alleged vote chori. Addressing the lawyer, the bench said, “Pursue Your Remedy Wherever You Want,” refusing to entertain the public interest petition.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a PIL seeking a probe into Viceroy Research’s fraud allegations against Vedanta, with Solicitor General warning of foreign short-sellers misusing Indian courts. The petitioner later withdrew the case after the Bench showed disinclination.
