The Rajasthan High Court’s Division Bench set aside controversial orders that treated a personal writ like a PIL and directed FIR registration. The Court ruled that judges cannot exceed the scope of relief sought in petitions, reinforcing strict judicial discipline.
The Supreme Court set aside the Calcutta High Court’s demolition order and allowed a housing project near Visva-Bharati University, holding that “khoai” is not a recognised land category under West Bengal law. The Court ruled that in the absence of fraud or major illegality, demolition is a harsh measure and imposed a Rs 1 lakh cost on PIL petitioners.
SC slams frivolous petition by RTI activist, says it’s judicial adventurism, not public interest.
Court warns against abuse of PILs in electoral matters.
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Judge Justice BV Nagarathna recently raised concerns about the misuse of Public Interest Litigations (PILs), emphasizing that it is time to reflect on how PILs, once a powerful legal tool for justice, are now being misused by some individuals.
