The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging Manubhai Parmar’s appointment as BPSC chairman, deeming it factless and publicity-driven. The bench criticized petitioner Brajesh for lacking seriousness and proper grounds, emphasizing that PILs must serve genuine public interest. The matter remains under review as responses are awaited.
Delhi HC dismissed a PIL seeking repeal of BNS provisions, stating courts can’t force Parliament to change laws. Bench said, “It will amount to legislating. It is not under our realm.”
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL for a separate Gujjar Regiment in the Indian Army, emphasizing equal recruitment policies without caste distinctions. The judges criticized the demand as unconstitutional, reaffirming the Army’s commitment to national unity through integrated regiments. The petitioner withdrew the case after the court’s observations.
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL regarding a protocol lapse during CJI Gavai’s visit to Maharashtra, labeling it a publicity stunt. The petitioner was fined ₹7,000 for misusing judicial time, with the Court emphasizing the importance of respecting constitutional offices and discouraging trivial issues from being used for media attention.
The Supreme Court of India declined to hear a PIL regarding AI-generated deepfake videos of Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, advising the petitioner to approach the Delhi High Court, which is already addressing similar issues. The bench acknowledged the seriousness of the matter but stressed the importance of the ongoing proceedings in the High Court.
NEW DELHI: 5th May: On Monday, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) that asked the Union Home Ministry and all State governments to take strong safety measures for tourists visiting hill stations and remote areas.
Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh (India): Today, 17th March, The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into alleged irregularities during the Mahakumbh event in Prayagraj.
New Delhi, Feb 14: The Supreme Court of India has ruled that courts cannot instruct the legislature on how to frame laws. A bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih made this observation while hearing an appeal against a Delhi High Court order from February 2024.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a PIL against Rahul Gandhi for alleged objectionable remarks, calling it “misconceived” and imposing a Rs 25,000 fine on the All India Dalit Action Committee. The court advised politicians to uphold decorum in speeches and emphasized that such matters are beyond judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The Allahabad High Court today dismissed a PIL against UP Deputy CM Keshav Prasad Maurya without seeking government response or issuing notices. The petition accused Maurya of misusing his position and cited criminal cases against him. The court will issue necessary orders on the petition at a later date, leaving the outcome uncertain.
