The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL challenging the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections on waging war against India. The Bench cautioned petitioner Upendra Nath Dalai for repeatedly filing similar petitions and hinted at imposing costs.
Today, On 10th October, The Supreme Court has dismissed a PIL seeking a court-monitored investigation into child deaths caused by adulterated cough syrups. The bench stated that proper state authorities are already handling the matter, denying central court intervention.
The Madras High Court dismissed a PIL asking the Election Commission to clarify Rahul Gandhi’s allegation of voter list manipulation. The court imposed a Rs 1 lakh cost, calling the plea a publicity-driven move.
The Karnataka High Court rejected a PIL seeking directions to Rahul Gandhi and others to disclose a supposed “Volume 2” of Mahatma Gandhi’s autobiography. The bench termed the plea “vague” and said no such relief could be granted.
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a PIL challenging the land sale of Mukesh Ambani’s Antilia residence, stating, “The issue has already been adjudicated, no interference is called for.” The court said no further action was needed.
Supreme Court dismisses petition calling for economic assessment of freebies and cash benefit schemes. Bench says, “We are not inclined to entertain this petition.”
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandatory six airbags in passenger vehicles, calling it a policy matter. The petitioner was told to approach the government instead.
The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging Manubhai Parmar’s appointment as BPSC chairman, deeming it factless and publicity-driven. The bench criticized petitioner Brajesh for lacking seriousness and proper grounds, emphasizing that PILs must serve genuine public interest. The matter remains under review as responses are awaited.
Delhi HC dismissed a PIL seeking repeal of BNS provisions, stating courts can’t force Parliament to change laws. Bench said, “It will amount to legislating. It is not under our realm.”
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL for a separate Gujjar Regiment in the Indian Army, emphasizing equal recruitment policies without caste distinctions. The judges criticized the demand as unconstitutional, reaffirming the Army’s commitment to national unity through integrated regiments. The petitioner withdrew the case after the court’s observations.
