The Supreme Court of India refused to entertain a PIL challenging the procedure for recording caste details in the 2027 Census. However, the Court asked the Centre and census authorities to consider the petitioner’s suggestions on transparency and verification.
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed Mehbooba Mufti’s PIL seeking transfer of prisoners from outside jails to J-K, terming it politically driven. The court said PILs cannot be used to gain political mileage or turn courts into platforms for electoral advantage.
The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL challenging the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections on waging war against India. The Bench cautioned petitioner Upendra Nath Dalai for repeatedly filing similar petitions and hinted at imposing costs.
Today, On 10th October, The Supreme Court has dismissed a PIL seeking a court-monitored investigation into child deaths caused by adulterated cough syrups. The bench stated that proper state authorities are already handling the matter, denying central court intervention.
The Madras High Court dismissed a PIL asking the Election Commission to clarify Rahul Gandhi’s allegation of voter list manipulation. The court imposed a Rs 1 lakh cost, calling the plea a publicity-driven move.
The Karnataka High Court rejected a PIL seeking directions to Rahul Gandhi and others to disclose a supposed “Volume 2” of Mahatma Gandhi’s autobiography. The bench termed the plea “vague” and said no such relief could be granted.
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a PIL challenging the land sale of Mukesh Ambani’s Antilia residence, stating, “The issue has already been adjudicated, no interference is called for.” The court said no further action was needed.
Supreme Court dismisses petition calling for economic assessment of freebies and cash benefit schemes. Bench says, “We are not inclined to entertain this petition.”
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandatory six airbags in passenger vehicles, calling it a policy matter. The petitioner was told to approach the government instead.
The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging Manubhai Parmar’s appointment as BPSC chairman, deeming it factless and publicity-driven. The bench criticized petitioner Brajesh for lacking seriousness and proper grounds, emphasizing that PILs must serve genuine public interest. The matter remains under review as responses are awaited.
