The Supreme Court dismissed a plea claiming Arundhati Roy’s book cover violated anti-tobacco laws, calling it a publicity-driven case. The Court held the image was not an advertisement and did not breach COTPA.
The Supreme Court today dismissed the PIL alleging ECI’s EVM misuse, deeming the allegations vague and an abuse of legal process. The Bench advised filing election petitions with the High Court for election-related concerns, criticizing the lack of evidence in the petition. The plea for a high-powered committee to investigate ECI’s actions was also rejected.
![[Rs 5,100 Crore Scam in Axis Bank-Max Life Deal] Delhi High Court Urges RBI and SEBI to Conclude Probe "without delay"](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-63-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court dismissed Subramanian Swamy’s PIL alleging a Rs 5,100 crore scam in the Axis Bank-Max Life deal, directing SEBI and RBI to conclude their investigation promptly. Swamy accused Axis Bank of illegal gains through Max Life shares transactions and emphasized the need to prevent similar incidents. The Court noted broader concerns about corruption in the banking and insurance sectors.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the mandatory FASTag implementation for vehicles, reinforcing its legality and public interest. The decision asserts that FASTag is essential for smoother traffic flow and environmental conservation. The ruling emphasizes modernizing toll collection methods and citizens’ adaptation to systems for the greater good.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the observance of June 25 as ‘Samvidhaan Hatya Divas,’ which commemorates resistance against the 1975 National Emergency. The petition sought to rename it ‘Samvidhaan Raksha Diwas,’ but the Court deemed it a political matter, emphasizing the government’s authority in making such declarations. The plea was ultimately rejected.
The Delhi High Court today dismissed a PIL challenging the government’s designation of June 25 as Samvidhaan Hatya Divas, meant to honor those affected by the 1975 National Emergency. The Court emphasized that the notification did not challenge the Emergency proclamation but criticized its misuse of power. The PIL was deemed insubstantial.
Today (16th April): The Madras High Court rejected a PIL challenging the BJP candidate’s nomination from Tirunelveli, citing lateness for relief. The petitioner alleged violations of electoral laws and concealment of a pending criminal case. The court advised the petitioner to approach the Election Commission earlier and again, if necessary. The nomination controversy continues.