Freedom Of One Person Ends Where Another’s Rights Begin: Allahabad High Court Bars Live-In Relationships For Married Persons

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a married person cannot enter a live-in relationship without first obtaining a legal divorce. The court said personal liberty is not absolute, holding freedom ends where statutory rights of another person begin.

“Wife Is Not an Accused”: Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan HC Order Forcing Rape Accused’s US-Based Wife to Stay in India

The Supreme Court set aside a Rajasthan High Court order that required a rape accused’s wife, who lives and works in the US, to remain in India. The Court held that imposing conditions on a non-party violates procedure and accepted the accused’s undertaking to attend hearings via video-conferencing.

‘Individual Cannot Always Be the Centre of Attention’: Supreme Court Prioritises National Interest Over Personal Liberty

The Supreme Court held that while Article 21 rights are vital, they cannot be the only basis for bail in cases involving national security. The Court said individual liberty is secondary when the country’s sovereignty and integrity are at risk.

Two Consenting Adults Have the Right to Live-In Relationship, Even Without Attaining Marriageable Age: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court said that two consenting adults have the right to live in a relationship even without attaining the legal marriageable age. The Court stressed that Article 21 protects such personal choices and ensures freedom and safety.

Conviction Lacks Strong Evidence, Influenced by Media Trial: Prajwal Revanna Tells Karnataka High Court

Karnataka High Court heard Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra argue that the rape conviction of suspended JD(S) leader Prajwal Revanna lacked strong evidence and had been improperly influenced by an intense media trial, undermining fairness seriously.

Deleting Savarkar speech video is Rahul Gandhi’s personal liberty, rules Pune Court

A Pune Magistrate dismissed Satyaki Savarkar’s plea seeking to stop Rahul Gandhi from deleting an alleged defamatory video. The court said, “The complainant has filed the CD of the alleged defamatory video. That can be relied upon by the Court during trial.”

Decide Anticipatory and Regular Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing: Supreme Court Directs High Courts & Trial Courts

The Supreme Court has directed all High Courts and trial courts to ensure that anticipatory and regular bail applications are decided within two months from the date of filing, stressing timely justice and protection of constitutional ethos.

India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Game | Match Must Go On: Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Hearing on PIL Seeking Cancellation of Match

Today, On 11th September, Supreme Court says “Match Must Go On,” refusing urgent hearing on PIL seeking cancellation of India vs Pakistan Asia Cup game. Petitioners argued that holding the match after Pahalgam terror attack hurts national dignity and public sentiment.

India vs Pakistan Match Sends an Anti-National Message to Our Forces & Civilians: Plea in Supreme Court Seeks Ban on Asia Cup Match

A plea filed in the Supreme Court has sought a ban on the India vs Pakistan Asia Cup match, claiming the game “sends an anti-national message to our forces and civilians that we do not care for you.”

Supreme Court vs Allahabad High Court: SC Slams HC for 21–43 Adjournments in Bail Cases, Stresses Speedy Justice in Liberty Matters

The Supreme Court expressed displeasure after the Allahabad High Court adjourned a bail plea 21 times, stressing that matters of personal liberty must be decided quickly. CJI B R Gavai asked the High Court Chief Justice to ensure the bail hearing is not delayed further.