The Delhi High Court grilled Patanjali over its chyawanprash ad calling all other brands “dhoka,” asking, “How can you call everyone fraud?” Dabur, holding a 61% market share, alleges the ad defames and misleads consumers by branding competitors as deceptive.
The Delhi High Court has permitted Patanjali to use the phrase “why settle for ordinary Chyawanprash” in its advertisements but restricted it from referring to Dabur’s “40-herb” product, calling such reference impermissible. The Court said comparative puffery in ads is allowed but cannot directly target a rival brand.
The Delhi High Court has mandated Baba Ramdev to submit a written promise not to make offensive comments about competitors, particularly Hamdard. This follows his derogatory remarks in a promotional video for Patanjali’s Gulab Sharbat. Ramdev’s actions prompted strong criticism from the Court, which seeks assurance of compliance by May 9.
Baba Ramdev faced criticism for using communal language against Hamdard’s Rooh Afza, claiming funds were used for religious buildings. After a Delhi High Court reprimand, he agreed to remove the videos and avoid future disparaging remarks, ensuring compliance while a police complaint regarding religious hatred remains pending. The case proceeds on May 1.
The Delhi High Court criticized Baba Ramdev for his communal remarks against Hamdard and its product Rooh Afza during a defamation suit. Justice Amit Bansal expressed concern over Ramdev’s statements, which were perceived as hate speech. Hamdard’s lawyer urged immediate action to prevent further divisive comments from Ramdev.