Opposing bail, Delhi Police told the High Court that smuggling inflammable material inside Parliament smoke canisters to terrorise MPs was intolerable and dangerous. Police said Manoranjan D and Sagar Sharma were lead conspirators whose acts triggered live chaos nationwide.
Delhi High Court pulls up accused in Parliament security breach case, says disrupting Parliament is the “best way to create terror”, asks police to respond to bail plea.
Today, On 2nd July, The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat, accused in the December 13, 2023 Parliament security breach case. The incident had sparked major security concerns within the nation’s highest legislative body.
Today, On 2nd July, The Delhi High Court is set to pronounce its decision on the bail pleas of two accused in the December 2023 Parliament security breach case. The incident had raised serious concerns over national security lapses.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Delhi Police to respond to a bail plea filed by one of the accused in the Parliament security breach case of December 13, 2023. A bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Anup Jairam Bhambhani issued a notice to the police regarding the petition filed by Manoranjan D. He had challenged a trial court’s decision that refused him bail.
On 7th March, Delhi Police have sought a 90-day extension from the Patiala House Court to investigate the high-profile Parliament security breach on December 13, 2023, involving individuals leaping into the Lok Sabha chamber. The court acknowledged the seriousness of the case and issued notices to the accused, emphasizing the nation’s sovereignty and integrity.
On 1st March: Accused individuals involved in the Parliament security breach claim coercion to confess and implicate political parties. The Patiala House Court in Delhi postponed the hearing to March 11 as the accused retained new counsel. They allege torture, blank page signing under duress, and coercion during tests. The court extended their judicial custody.
Five individuals accused in the Parliament security breach case have alleged torture and coercion by the Delhi Police, raising concerns about detainee treatment. The accused, including Manoranjan D and Sagar Sharma, claim they were forced to confess and implicate opposition parties. The case not only highlights security concerns but also raises questions about police conduct and human rights.
Six individuals involved in the Parliament security breach case will remain in judicial custody until March 1, raising concerns about national safety and government functioning. The accused are facing serious charges under the UAPA law, and the court has emphasized the necessity for a thorough investigation due to the gravity of the allegations.
In a recent development concerning the Parliament security breach case, the Delhi High Court has agreed to hear a plea by the city police challenging a trial court’s directive to provide a copy of the First Information Report (FIR) to one of the accused. This decision comes amidst heightened scrutiny and legal proceedings following a […]
