Today, On 16th January, Supreme Court rejected Justice Yashwant Varma’s plea against the Lok Sabha Speaker’s decision to set up a three-member inquiry committee under the Judges Inquiry Act. The Bench delivered its ruling after reserving judgment on January 8, and declined interference.
Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma told a Parliamentary panel that no cash was found at his New Delhi residence during the March 2025 fire and clarified he was not present when the incident occurred.
Advocate Karan Umesh Salvi has been appointed as a consultant to assist the panel probing the allegations. The investigation follows the discovery of cash at Justice Yashwant Varma’s residence, aiming to examine grounds for his possible removal from the Allahabad High Court.
The Delhi High Court will hear on August 25 AAP’s plea seeking government accommodation in the national capital for Arvind Kejriwal, its national convenor and former Chief Minister, after he vacated his official residence following resignation.
Outgoing Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia says the apex court will remain the “torchbearer of freedom and justice” as he bids an emotional goodbye, recalling his love for “Hindustan.”
SCBA President Vikas Singh lauded Justice Dhulia for vacating his residence the same day, calling it “outstanding,” while criticising ex-CJI DY Chandrachud for allegedly overstaying in government housing. Singh said judges must lead by example to uphold the court’s dignity.
CJI BR Gavai promises to vacate his official residence within rules, subtly contrasting with ex-CJI Chandrachud’s delayed exit. Quote surfaces during Justice Dhulia’s farewell, stirring fresh buzz over post-retirement housing norms.
Former CJI DY Chandrachud responded to the bungalow controversy saying their packing is done and they’ll shift the next day the house is ready. He said the allotted home needs major repairs, which caused the delay.
The MP High Court Bar Council President, Dhanya Kumar Jain, apologized to Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kaith over false allegations of demolishing a Hanuman temple at the Chief Justice’s residence. Jain admitted his claims were based on misinformation from a lawyer’s complaint. Clarifications from the PWD department and High Court administration confirmed that no temple ever existed at the site. Expressing regret for the confusion caused, Jain assured no further action would be pursued on the matter.
