Delhi High Court: Language Barrier Should Not Stop Students from Taking CLAT; NLU Consortium Told to Decide in 8 Weeks

The Delhi High Court emphasized that the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) should accommodate students from non-English medium backgrounds by considering conducting the exam in regional languages. The Court instructed the National Law Universities Consortium to make a concrete decision within eight weeks to ensure no student is excluded due to language barriers.

CLAT | How To Crack Common Law Admission Test In 1st Attempt ?

CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) is India’s most popular law entrance exam, with over 60,000 students appearing every year. Although there are more than 1,800 law colleges in the country, most aspirants dream of securing a seat in the top 26 National Law Universities (NLUs). These NLUs are regarded as the best institutes for legal education in India.

CLAT-UG 2025| Petitioner Plans to Move Supreme Court; Hearing Adjourned to January 30: Delhi High Court

NEW DELHI: The candidate, Aditya Singh, who has challenged the results of the 2025 Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-UG), informed the Delhi High Court on Tuesday (7th Jan) that he plans to approach the Supreme Court to request the transfer of the case from the High Court to the top court.

CLAT PG 2025 | ‘Any Selection Based on Final Answer Key Subject to Final Disposal of The Case’: Bombay HC Seeks NLU Consortium’s Response

Today, On 24th December, After Madhya Pradesh, the Bombay High Court asked the NLU consortium to respond to a plea against the CLAT PG 2025 exam. The CLAT 2025 exam has faced criticism due to claims of incorrect answer keys for both UG and PG exams. Many candidates questioned the fairness of the evaluation process, leading to legal cases in different courts. The NLU consortium’s reply is expected to explain its position and address these concerns.

NLU Consortium Filed Appeal Against Delhi High Court’s Order to Revise CLAT 2025 Results

The NLU Consortium has appealed to the Delhi High Court against a ruling that required revising CLAT 2025 results due to errors identified in the exam questions. The court acknowledged mistakes in two questions and mandated corrections, while the Consortium argues this judicial intervention oversteps boundaries on academic matters. Both sides await further hearings.