The Supreme Court Today (Aug 29) asked the Madras High Court to hear petitions against the three new criminal laws quickly. The Court said it will benefit from the High Court’s opinion before deciding on the constitutional validity.
The Supreme Court of India has stayed trial proceedings against Karnataka BJP MLC CT Ravi, accused of making sexist remarks against Congress leader Laxmi Hebbalkar during a legislative session in December 2024. Ravi claims legal immunity for comments made in the House, while the incident has sparked political tensions between BJP and Congress.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah reviewed three new criminal laws in Delhi, intended to replace colonial-era legislation. These laws focus on justice rather than punishment, reflecting the Prime Minister’s vision for a modern legal system. Additionally, Delhi introduced the MedLEaPR digital system to enhance medical and legal reporting efficiency within the justice process.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a mother can be considered an accomplice to rape under Section 109 of the IPC if she encourages the crime. The accused man was convicted of rape, while his mother faced charges of abetment, highlighting the equal responsibility for those who facilitate such acts.
Lawyers have played a crucial role in nation-building by upholding the Constitution and ensuring justice, said Amit Shah. Their contributions in protecting fundamental rights and guiding legal reforms have strengthened democracy. He emphasized that legal professionals have shaped the country’s governance through their dedication and expertise. Their efforts continue to safeguard constitutional values and the rule of law.
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of provisions in the new criminal laws, including the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. Advocate Vishal Tiwari argues these laws violate fundamental rights, citing excessive police powers and longer detention periods. The plea seeks judicial review and striking down of specific sections as unconstitutional.
Delhi Police achieved their first conviction under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws, sentencing 20-year-old Neeraj to three months’ imprisonment for burglary. After stealing valuables from a residence, Neeraj was arrested using CCTV evidence. This case, marking a significant legal milestone, showcases the enforcement of the new criminal laws.
The Delhi High Court highlighted the need to discard outdated criminal laws in favor of newly enacted legislation, reinforcing Parliament’s intent. The court condemned reliance on old laws in new petitions, urging adherence to the updated legal framework established on July 1, 2024, to enhance justice effectiveness and align with modern societal needs.
Today(17th Sept),The Supreme Court of India rejected PILs challenging the new criminal laws that replaced the IPC, CrPC, and Indian Evidence Act, citing deficiencies in the petitions’ drafting. Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan advised the petitioners to undertake more detailed research if they wish to address their concerns in court again.
Former Chief Justice of India UU Lalit praised the new criminal laws for addressing mob lynching and welcomed changes related to hit-and-run cases. He supported the 15-day police custody rule and hailed the abolition of the colonial-era sedition law. Lalit compared the new laws to previous anti-terrorism legislation and emphasized the need for a democratic society.