![[NEET-UG 2024 Row] Supreme Court to Hear Review Petition on October 22](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-1-7.png?resize=300%2C169&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India will review a petition on October 22, 2024, concerning the NEET-UG 2024 examination, challenging a prior decision not to reconduct it. Filed on August 31, petitioners hope to present new evidence. Despite concerns over the NTA’s operations, the Court upheld the exam’s validity while ordering reforms.
Today(on 22nd July), The Supreme Court directed IIT Delhi to form a panel of experts to review a disputed NEET-UG exam question, with a report due by Tuesday noon. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s bench heard petitions about alleged exam irregularities, focusing on a question with ambiguous options affecting the scoring of candidates.
Today, On 22nd July, Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan assured transparency in NEET-UG matters, stating that the government has disclosed all information to the Supreme Court. He welcomed discussions and emphasized minimal evidence of paper leaks over seven years. Pradhan defended the centralized exam pattern and dismissed blame games, aiming to uphold trust and credibility in educational affairs.
![[NEET-UG Row] NTA Published Result in their Official Website Today, Following the Supreme court's Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/1717503828911-Women20Bollywood202024-06-04T173040.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today(20th July),The National Testing Agency (NTA) has released the NEET-UG 2024 results on its website, as directed by the Supreme Court, ensuring transparency and fairness. The results are available online, categorized by examination center and city, aiming to promote fairness and transparency in the examination process. Students can access detailed scores on the official NEET website.
![[NEET-UG Paper Leak] "Re-Test to Be Ordered if Guilty Candidates Cannot be Identified": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-2024-07-18T133722.806.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 18th July, The Supreme Court stated that a retest for NEET-UG may be ordered if guilt cannot be clearly determined in response to the results controversy. The examination’s integrity is emphasized, with ongoing legal proceedings highlighting the critical need for fairness and trust in the educational assessment system.
![[NEET-UG 2024 Row] Controversy Over NEET-UG Physics Question: IIT-D Experts Confirm Only One Correct Answer](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-39-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Three AIIMS Patna doctors are detained by the CBI today for their involvement in the NEET-UG paper leak and exam irregularities. Two individuals have already been arrested, with one detained for 14 days and the other for 10. The Supreme Court is set to hear multiple petitions related to the controversy, with the Centre and NTA providing additional affidavits.
Today, On 16th July, The CBI arrested an engineer for the NEET paper leak, tracing it to Hazaribagh. The investigation revealed tampering with question papers at Oasis school, leading to the arrest of two individuals. The CBI has filed multiple FIRs and arrested around 60 people in connection with irregularities in the medical entrance exam, prompting concerns about the exam’s integrity and potential retesting.
The National Testing Agency (NTA), which conducted the National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) (undergraduate) 2024, has informed the Supreme Court that a central piece of evidence to show that a mass paper leak had happened a day prior to the exam on May 5, was edited to create a “false impression of an early leak”.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) on Friday opposes the cancellation of the NEET UG exam, citing isolated incidents of malpractice and arguing that canceling the entire exam would harm the interests of honest candidates. They emphasized the fair conduct of the exam and highlighted measures taken to ensure its integrity. The controversy is under Supreme Court scrutiny.
