Delhi High Court has reserved its order on IRS officer Sameer Wankhede’s plea seeking removal of allegedly defamatory scenes from a Netflix series. Arguments focused on jurisdiction, online publications, and claims of “irreparable harm” to Wankhede’s reputation.
The Supreme Court will review claims that AI-generated case laws were cited in pleadings, raising concerns about fabricated inputs. It cautioned that the appellant would be taken to task if the citations proved fictitious, echoing the opponent’s charge.
Today, On 14th November, The Supreme Court refused to consider petitions by Bata and Liberty against a Delhi High Court decision restoring Crocs’ passing off suits. This ruling clears the path for Crocs to continue its legal proceedings against several Indian footwear manufacturers.
IRS officer Sameer Wankhede told the Delhi High Court that Shah Rukh Khan’s Red Chillies Entertainment unfairly mocked him in the Netflix series ‘Ba**ds of Bollywood’*, arguing that the defence of satire is not absolute. The Court has sought responses and will hear the case again on November 17.
The Supreme Court will hear in August the plea filed by the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction, challenging the Maharashtra Speaker’s decision that awarded the iconic Shiv Sena “bow and arrow” symbol to the Eknath Shinde-led group.
The Supreme Court ruled that government entities cannot include clauses for unilateral arbitrator appointments in public-private contracts, as these violate Article 14 of the Constitution, undermining fairness. The decision, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, applies to three-member arbitration panels, emphasizing equal treatment and impartiality in the arbitration process.
