The Madras High Court ruled that trial judges must actively participate in proceedings and not remain passive observers. Justices GR Swaminathan and R Poornima restored a money recovery suit, holding that courts must seek clarifications and ensure fair trial principles through judicial engagement.
The Supreme Court ruled that borrowers are not entitled to a personal oral hearing before their loan accounts are classified as fraud under the Reserve Bank of India’s directions. It held written submissions and safeguards meet legal requirements.
The Rajasthan High Court set aside the Jaipur Development Authority’s termination of Assistant Advocates, stressing that lawyers must be treated with dignity. The Bench held their engagement cannot be at the authority’s whims and must follow reasonable procedures.
The Delhi High Court held that holding a passport and travelling abroad is integral to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav quashed impounding orders, citing violation of natural justice principles.
The Allahabad High Court judge candidly recorded that he was “hungry, tired and physically incapacitated” after hearing a matter beyond working hours due to a heavy cause list and a deadline set by the Supreme Court of India. The rare remark highlights the intense workload and mounting pressure on High Court judges amid massive case pendency.
Today, On 19th February, The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition filed by former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay. The petition had challenged the court’s 2022 decision upholding the CAT Chairman’s order to transfer his case from Kolkata Bench to Delhi.
The Karnataka High Court has stayed the Enforcement Directorate’s FEMA proceedings against Malavika Hegde, CEO of Coffee Day Enterprises, citing serious legal issues including delay and liability. The Court has paused the ED’s 2022 complaint, show cause notice, and hearing notices till further hearing on January 23.
The Supreme Court has held that any writ order passed without impleading an affected or necessary party is invalid in law. The Court ruled that the right to be heard cannot be sacrificed on procedural grounds and must prevail in writ proceedings.
The Patna High Court ruled that merely participating in a strike cannot automatically lead to termination of service unless the strike is illegal or the employee is guilty of misconduct. The Court held that termination without enquiry, notice or due process violates principles of natural justice and constitutional rights.
The Delhi High Court set aside Union Bank of India’s decision to label a company linked to Jai Anmol Ambani as fraudulent, citing violation of natural justice. The Court held that no valid show cause notice was served and allowed the bank to restart the process afresh as per law.
