Delhi High Court Upholds Strict CUET Entry Rules, Denies Relief to Student Late by 6 Minutes: “Discipline Must Not Be Relaxed”

Delhi High Court has upheld the strict entry rules for CUET and denied relief to a student who arrived six minutes late. The court said, “Discipline must not be relaxed” to ensure fairness among all candidates.

NEET-UG Reforms|| “2 weeks Extension Granted Expert Panel to File Report”: CJI D.Y. Chandrachud

Today, On 21st October, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud announced a two-week extension for an expert panel reviewing NEET-UG reforms. The Supreme Court’s decision allows the panel to finalize its comprehensive report, addressing key issues in the exam’s administration and highlighting security lapses, while ensuring improvements in transparency and efficiency.

[NEET Controversy] Delhi HC Dismisses Candidate’s Petition On Out-of-Syllabus Question

Today, On 7th August, The Delhi High Court dismissed a NEET candidate’s plea regarding an “out-of-syllabus” question, maintaining the exam’s integrity. The court emphasized that it cannot challenge subject experts’ judgment. Two other petitions claiming incorrect answers were also dismissed. The NEET-UG 2024 exam was conducted by the NTA, with the Supreme Court refusing to cancel it.

[NEET-UG 2024] ‘Propaganda’ Slammed by Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan After SC’s Verdict

Today, On 2nd August, The Education Minister criticized “propaganda” following the Supreme Court’s NEET-UG 2024 verdict, emphasizing the need for accurate information dissemination. The Supreme Court defended its decision not to cancel the exam due to lack of systemic breach, advising the NTA to avoid “flip-flops.” The Court highlighted NTA’s deficiencies and expanded the mandate of a committee to review its functioning.

BREAKING | “Let the Students Come Here Themselves”: CJI Refuses to Entertain PIL Against Govt’s Decision to Cancel UGC-NET Exam

Today(on 29th July), The Supreme Court declined to hear a PIL challenging the cancellation of the UGC-NET exam due to allegations of a question paper leak, sparking debate and concern among stakeholders. The Chief Justice clarified that the dismissal of the PIL does not imply a judgment on the core issues, emphasizing that affected students should present their concerns directly.

‘Satyamev Jayate, Truth Has Prevailed’ : Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan Praises SC’s NEET Decision, Announces High-Level Panel To Revamp NTA

Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan lauded the Supreme Court’s decision on NEET, announcing a high-level panel to revamp the National Testing Agency. He emphasized the government’s dedication to transparency and accountability, with plans for a comprehensive NTA overhaul. Pradhan also called for an apology from Rahul Gandhi for politicizing the issue, aiming to restore confidence in the educational system.

[NEET-UG 2024 Case] Detailed Chronology of Events

The NEET-UG 2024 exam encountered technical issues, sparking concerns and leading to petitions and judicial involvement. The Supreme Court dismissed pleas for cancellation and re-test due to lack of evidence for systemic leaks. However, irregularities prompted investigations and re-tests, affecting candidates and prompting court directions for result disclosures and expert reviews.

“NTA Needs to be completely revamped, You Cannot Hold Exam of this Magnitude Under a Present System”: Kapil Sibal

On Tuesday(23rd July),The Supreme Court has refused to cancel the NEET-UG 2024 examination despite acknowledging paper leaks. Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal has called for a complete overhaul of the National Testing Agency, criticizing its ability to handle the examination effectively.

NEET-UG Row | CJI Ordered IIT Delhi Director to Appoint Three Experts for Review and Submit Their Opinion by Noon Tomorrow

Today(on 22nd July), The Supreme Court directed IIT Delhi to form a panel of experts to review a disputed NEET-UG exam question, with a report due by Tuesday noon. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s bench heard petitions about alleged exam irregularities, focusing on a question with ambiguous options affecting the scoring of candidates.