CJI BR Gavai shared how he barely attended classes, relied on friends for attendance, yet stood third in law exams. He told students that success comes from hard work, dedication, and commitment—not exam ranks.
The Supreme Court has issued notice on a PIL seeking formation of a Legal Education Commission to review the LLB and LLM course duration, fee structure, and curriculum, citing concerns over accessibility and affordability for students.
Students from NLUs have launched an online petition against the high CLAT application and counselling fees. They said, “Fees are too high and go against the NEP’s goal of inclusivity,” demanding immediate reforms from the Consortium.
CLAT PG candidates have approached the Kerala High Court against the counselling fee, saying it “fails to consider socio-economic disparities” and ends up excluding deserving students from poor backgrounds, violating the principle of equal opportunity.
The Delhi High Court is currently examining 15 disputed questions from the CLAT 2025 UG exam, following complaints from candidates. The outcome of the case could impact the final results and merit list of the national law entrance test.
Today, On 9th April, The Delhi High Court questioned whether it is reasonable to expect a Class 12 student to have knowledge of Contract Law while assessing the CLAT 2025 UG paper. This came up during hearings on multiple petitions highlighting alleged errors in the exam. The petitioners argued that the paper included concepts beyond the expected syllabus. The Court has now concluded the hearings and reserved its judgment.
At Delhi University’s inaugural constitutional lecture series, Supreme Court Judge Justice P S Narasimha delivered a profound address highlighting the deep connection between citizens’ rights and duties. He described “Kartavyam” (duty) as a “Sadhana”, or spiritual discipline, essential for achieving societal harmony. Drawing a powerful analogy, he likened rights and duties to the sun and sunlight—inseparable and life-giving. His remarks emphasized the need for a balanced approach to constitutional values.
NEW DELHI: On January 15, 2025, the Supreme Court showed a tendency to transfer petitions challenging the results of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 to the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
NEW DELHI: The candidate, Aditya Singh, who has challenged the results of the 2025 Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-UG), informed the Delhi High Court on Tuesday (7th Jan) that he plans to approach the Supreme Court to request the transfer of the case from the High Court to the top court.
Petitioners have challenged the CLAT 2025 today (5th Dec) provisional answer key in the Supreme Court, citing errors in 12 questions and inadequate time to raise objections. They seek a stay on results and admission counseling, criticizing the Rs 1,000 fee for objections despite a prior Rs 4,000 exam fee. Final results are due December 10.
