• Tue. May 12th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: Mukul Rohatgi

    Delhi High Court slams “roving inquiry” plea, dismisses PIL seeking CBI probe into Hyatt Regency owner’s loan settlement with PNB, BOM
    Delhi High Court slams “roving inquiry” plea, dismisses PIL seeking CBI probe into Hyatt Regency owner’s loan settlement with PNB, BOM
    High CourtLatest news

    Delhi High Court slams “roving inquiry” plea, dismisses PIL seeking CBI probe into Hyatt Regency owner’s loan settlement with PNB, BOM

    The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL by NGO Infrastructure Watchdog seeking a probe into Punjab National Bank and Bank of Maharashtra’s One-Time Settlement with Asian Hotels North, calling it speculative and unsupported by facts.

    author
    Cash-for-Vote Case| ACB Action Completely Illegal : CM Revanth Reddy To Supreme Court
    Cash-for-Vote Case| ACB Action Completely Illegal : CM Revanth Reddy To Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Cash-for-Vote Case| ACB Action Completely Illegal : CM Revanth Reddy To Supreme Court

    Today, On 15th October, In the Cash-for-Vote Case, Telangana CM A. Revanth Reddy told the Supreme Court that the ACB’s operation in 2015 was “completely illegal,” as it happened before any FIR was filed. The hearing is now adjourned to October 16.

    author
    ‘If He’s Jealous, He Can Move to London’: Salve-Bhushan War of Words in Supreme Court Over Indiabulls Scam
    ‘If He’s Jealous, He Can Move to London’: Salve-Bhushan War of Words in Supreme Court Over Indiabulls Scam
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    ‘If He’s Jealous, He Can Move to London’: Salve-Bhushan War of Words in Supreme Court Over Indiabulls Scam

    The Supreme Court saw a fiery exchange between Senior Advocates Harish Salve and Prashant Bhushan during the hearing of the Indiabulls Housing Finance fraud case. Heated words flew over alleged fund diversion, with Bhushan accusing Salve of being out of touch from London.

    author
    Supreme Court Puts Off Vodafone Idea’s Rs 5,606 Crore AGR Dues Hearing to October 13
    Supreme Court Puts Off Vodafone Idea’s Rs 5,606 Crore AGR Dues Hearing to October 13
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Puts Off Vodafone Idea’s Rs 5,606 Crore AGR Dues Hearing to October 13

    The Supreme Court has deferred to October 13 Vodafone Idea’s plea against DoT’s fresh Rs 5,606 crore AGR demand. Both the Centre and VIL sought more time to work out a possible solution.

    author
    Why Did You Not Hang Him Till Now?: Supreme Court Grills Centre On Balwant Singh’s Death Row Plea In Punjab CM Assassination Case
    Why Did You Not Hang Him Till Now?: Supreme Court Grills Centre On Balwant Singh’s Death Row Plea In Punjab CM Assassination Case
    Supreme Court

    Why Did You Not Hang Him Till Now?: Supreme Court Grills Centre On Balwant Singh’s Death Row Plea In Punjab CM Assassination Case

    The Supreme Court questioned the Centre over the 17-year delay in executing Balwant Singh Rajoana, convicted for assassinating Punjab CM Beant Singh in 1995. The Court asked, “Who is to blame for that?” while hearing his plea to commute the death sentence.

    author
    No Relief For Actor Jacqueline Fernandez: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Money Laundering Case
    No Relief For Actor Jacqueline Fernandez: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Money Laundering Case
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    No Relief For Actor Jacqueline Fernandez: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Money Laundering Case

    Today, On 22nd September, The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the Delhi High Court’s decision dismissing Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to quash the ECIR. The case involves alleged money laundering of Rs.200 crore linked to conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a Delhi High Court ruling that dismissed actor Jacqueline Fernandez’s […]

    author
    Chief Justice of Australia Visits Supreme Court of India| Current Visit Is Too Short, Longer Stay Would Allow Us to Host Across India: SG Tushar Mehta
    Chief Justice of Australia Visits Supreme Court of India| Current Visit Is Too Short, Longer Stay Would Allow Us to Host Across India: SG Tushar Mehta
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Chief Justice of Australia Visits Supreme Court of India| Current Visit Is Too Short, Longer Stay Would Allow Us to Host Across India: SG Tushar Mehta

    Chief Justice of Australia, Stephen Gageler, visited the Supreme Court of India today, joining CJI BR Gavai, Justice Vinod Chandran, and Justice NV Anjaria. SG Tushar Mehta said, “Current visit is too short, longer stay would allow us to host across India.”

    author
    Sanatan Dharma Remark| Court Has Done Many Things in the Past: Supreme Court to Hear Udhayanidhi Stalin's Plea
    Sanatan Dharma Remark| Court Has Done Many Things in the Past: Supreme Court to Hear Udhayanidhi Stalin's Plea
    Supreme Court

    Sanatan Dharma Remark| Court Has Done Many Things in the Past: Supreme Court to Hear Udhayanidhi Stalin’s Plea

    Today, On 1st September, In the Sanatan Dharma Remark Row, The Supreme Court observed, “This court has done many things in the past. It does not mean that we should also do the same thing.” The court will hear Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea in 2026.

    author
    ‘Attack on majesty of law’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slaps Rs 50,000 Penalty, Rejects Judge-Bias Transfer Plea
    ‘Attack on majesty of law’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slaps Rs 50,000 Penalty, Rejects Judge-Bias Transfer Plea
    High CourtHeadlines

    Bar Council Issues Notice to 16 Lawyers Over Bench Hunting in Punjab & Haryana High Court; Singhvi and Rohatgi Also to Respond

    The Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana has issued notices to 16 advocates regarding allegations of bench hunting at the High Court. Senior Advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mukul Rohatgi will also be asked to respond to the Privilege Committee.

    author
    Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case
    Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case

    Supreme Court holds that in-house inquiries against judges are valid despite the 1985 Protection Act. Justice Yashwant Varma’s challenge to the probe process was rejected.

    author