• Wed. Feb 4th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: Mukul Rohatgi

    No Relief For Actor Jacqueline Fernandez: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Money Laundering Case
    No Relief For Actor Jacqueline Fernandez: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Money Laundering Case
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    No Relief For Actor Jacqueline Fernandez: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Money Laundering Case

    Today, On 22nd September, The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the Delhi High Court’s decision dismissing Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to quash the ECIR. The case involves alleged money laundering of Rs.200 crore linked to conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a Delhi High Court ruling that dismissed actor Jacqueline Fernandez’s […]

    author
    Chief Justice of Australia Visits Supreme Court of India| Current Visit Is Too Short, Longer Stay Would Allow Us to Host Across India: SG Tushar Mehta
    Chief Justice of Australia Visits Supreme Court of India| Current Visit Is Too Short, Longer Stay Would Allow Us to Host Across India: SG Tushar Mehta
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Chief Justice of Australia Visits Supreme Court of India| Current Visit Is Too Short, Longer Stay Would Allow Us to Host Across India: SG Tushar Mehta

    Chief Justice of Australia, Stephen Gageler, visited the Supreme Court of India today, joining CJI BR Gavai, Justice Vinod Chandran, and Justice NV Anjaria. SG Tushar Mehta said, “Current visit is too short, longer stay would allow us to host across India.”

    author
    Sanatan Dharma Remark| Court Has Done Many Things in the Past: Supreme Court to Hear Udhayanidhi Stalin's Plea
    Sanatan Dharma Remark| Court Has Done Many Things in the Past: Supreme Court to Hear Udhayanidhi Stalin's Plea
    Supreme Court

    Sanatan Dharma Remark| Court Has Done Many Things in the Past: Supreme Court to Hear Udhayanidhi Stalin’s Plea

    Today, On 1st September, In the Sanatan Dharma Remark Row, The Supreme Court observed, “This court has done many things in the past. It does not mean that we should also do the same thing.” The court will hear Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea in 2026.

    author
    ‘Attack on majesty of law’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slaps Rs 50,000 Penalty, Rejects Judge-Bias Transfer Plea
    ‘Attack on majesty of law’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slaps Rs 50,000 Penalty, Rejects Judge-Bias Transfer Plea
    High CourtHeadlines

    Bar Council Issues Notice to 16 Lawyers Over Bench Hunting in Punjab & Haryana High Court; Singhvi and Rohatgi Also to Respond

    The Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana has issued notices to 16 advocates regarding allegations of bench hunting at the High Court. Senior Advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mukul Rohatgi will also be asked to respond to the Privilege Committee.

    author
    Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case
    Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case

    Supreme Court holds that in-house inquiries against judges are valid despite the 1985 Protection Act. Justice Yashwant Varma’s challenge to the probe process was rejected.

    author
    “Jailing Is Just Optics”: Supreme Court Slams Colonial-Era Investigation Methods in India
    “Jailing Is Just Optics”: Supreme Court Slams Colonial-Era Investigation Methods in India
    Supreme Court

    “Jailing Is Just Optics”: Supreme Court Slams Colonial-Era Investigation Methods in India

    Supreme Court criticises outdated criminal investigation practices, saying people are jailed just for appearance of action. Urges modern tools like forensic accounting and witness protection.

    author
    “How Can Law Students File Such a Petition?”: Supreme Court Lifts MP High Court Stay, Allows Paramedical Admissions to Resume
    “How Can Law Students File Such a Petition?”: Supreme Court Lifts MP High Court Stay, Allows Paramedical Admissions to Resume
    Supreme Court

    “How Can Law Students File Such a Petition?”: Supreme Court Lifts MP High Court Stay, Allows Paramedical Admissions to Resume

    The Supreme Court has stayed the MP High Court’s order halting admissions in paramedical courses, questioning the petitioners’ locus. Admissions for 2023–24 and 2024–25 can now proceed in Madhya Pradesh.

    author
    South Indians “Don’t Want to Be Isolated” Over Not Knowing Hindi, Says Justice B V Nagarathna
    South Indians “Don’t Want to Be Isolated” Over Not Knowing Hindi, Says Justice B V Nagarathna
    Supreme CourtLegal updates

    Supreme Court Clears West Bengal to Reclaim Iconic Ambassador Car Factory Land from Hindustan Motors

    Supreme Court upholds State’s decision to take back 395 acres in Uttarpara unused by Hindustan Motors. Land to be repurposed for Titagarh Rail’s coach manufacturing plant, boosting public interest.

    author
    Supreme Court Again Questions Why Top Advocates Show Up During Breaks: “We Don’t Understand the Appearance of Senior Counsel in Vacations”
    Supreme Court Again Questions Why Top Advocates Show Up During Breaks: “We Don’t Understand the Appearance of Senior Counsel in Vacations”
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Supreme Court Again Questions Top Advocates: “We Don’t Understand the Appearance of Senior Counsel in Vacations”

    Today, On 16th June, The Supreme Court once again questioned why top lawyers appear during court vacations, saying, “We don’t understand the appearance of senior counsel in vacations.” The bench expressed concern over disregarding regular court procedures during breaks.

    author
    Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against Ambani’s Z-Plus Security: “Frivolous & Vexatious”
    Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against Ambani’s Z-Plus Security: “Frivolous & Vexatious”
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against Ambani’s Z-Plus Security: “Frivolous & Vexatious”

    Today, On 13th June, The Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging Mukesh Ambani’s Z-plus security cover, calling the plea “frivolous & vexatious.” The Court made it clear that such petitions waste judicial time and serve no public interest.

    author