Ex-IPS officer G. Sampath Kumar has filed a fresh appeal before the Madras High Court opposing the order to record MS Dhoni’s evidence through an advocate commissioner in the ₹100 crore defamation case. He argued that “all litigants must be treated equally and no privilege or priority must be given to the celebrities.”
Madras High Court orders trial in MS Dhoni’s Rs 100-crore defamation suit against media over 2013 IPL betting allegations, marking a major step in the decade-old legal battle.
A Delhi lawyer has challenged MS Dhoni’s trademark application for “Captain Cool,” arguing that it is a generic term used for multiple sports figures, not exclusive to him. The opposition claims Dhoni’s fame cannot justify ownership of the phrase, and legal procedures were not properly followed in the registration process.
MS Dhoni’s trademark application for “Captain Cool” received acceptance from the Trade Marks Registry after overcoming initial objections due to a similar existing trademark. The mark is now published, initiating a four-month opposition period. If unopposed by mid-October 2025, Dhoni will secure exclusive rights for its use in entertainment and sports.
Yesterday, On 4th May, Former business associate of MS Dhoni, Mihir Diwakar, summoned to court for alleged Rs 15 crore fraud, involving financial discrepancies. Dhoni filed a complaint, leading to the court summoning Diwakar and his wife, Saumya Das, to appear on May 30. This development adds layers to ongoing controversies in the business world, highlighting the need for legal scrutiny.
On Wednesday (20th March): MS Dhoni filed a case against former business partners, alleging they cheated him of around Rs 16 crore by opening cricket academies without his consent and not sharing profits. A court in Ranchi has directed the issuance of summons to the accused, who allegedly breached their agreement with the former Indian cricket captain.
Sampath Kumar received a 15-day jail sentence from the Madras High Court for making defamatory comments about MS Dhoni. However, the Supreme Court intervened, staying the sentence and highlighting the delicate balance between freedom of expression and individual reputation in Indian law. The case continues to attract attention as it unfolds.
Former cricketer Mihir Diwakar and his wife have sued MS Dhoni for defamation, stemming from allegations of fraud and illegal fund acquisition. The Delhi High Court has directed the plaintiffs to clarify their accusations against various media outlets. Meanwhile, Dhoni’s legal team argues that the case against him is not maintainable, as the alleged incidents occurred in Ranchi. The next hearing is scheduled for April 3.
Former business partners Mihir Diwakar and Arun Pandey have filed a defamation suit against cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni, alleging defamatory statements that tarnished their reputation. This follows Dhoni’s criminal complaint against them for breach of trust and cheating in a 2017 contract related to cricket academies. The legal battle sheds light on complexities in business partnerships.
Madras High Court Upholds MS Dhoni’s Interrogatories in Defamation Suit Against Zee Media In a recent development, the Madras High Court has dismissed Zee Media’s appeal against a single judge’s order, which had rejected the media house’s challenge to the interrogatories raised by former Indian cricket team captain, MS Dhoni. The defamation suit stems from […]
