ANI Technologies argued in the Karnataka High Court that the state’s refusal to grant bike taxi permits violates fundamental rights, asserting that bike taxis are essential for urban mobility. The case highlights the balance between regulation and innovation, questioning executive powers in policy-making against existing legislation and emphasizing the public interest in transportation choices.
Over 6 lakh bike taxi riders in Karnataka await a pivotal ruling from the High Court regarding a ban on bike taxi services, impacting their livelihoods and daily transport. Protests for job security have emerged amidst legal challenges against the ban, igniting discussions on regulating new transport solutions across India.
In Bengaluru, bike taxi riders protested the High Court’s ban on their services, seeking government support and clear regulations for operations. Police detained them for protesting without permission, and the riders emphasized the economic impact of the ban on their livelihoods. They urged the government for a policy addressing safety and job security.
Today, On 9th April, The Supreme Court criticized the Centre for the delay in implementing a scheme to provide cashless treatment to road accident victims. The court expressed concern over the government’s slow response despite earlier directions. It emphasized the urgent need for such a welfare measure. The Centre has been asked to file a detailed response on the matter.
The Bombay High Court ruled that deducting Mediclaim amounts from medical expenses compensation is not permissible. The court emphasized that insurance payouts and compensation serve different legal purposes. It rejected an insurance company’s argument that medical costs were already covered under the policy. The ruling reinforces the rights of claimants to receive full medical compensation without deductions.