The Supreme Court has stayed the operation of Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, which imposed a six-month limit for filing accident claims. Tribunals and High Courts have been directed not to reject petitions solely due to delay.
Rapido, Uber, and Ola have challenged the Karnataka High Court’s earlier order stopping bike taxi operations until new rules are framed. The hearing was postponed as the Advocate General was busy before another bench.
Supreme Court rules that motor accident compensation survives to legal heirs even if the victim dies from unrelated causes, ensuring families receive rightful claims and enhanced compensation awards.
Ola, Uber, and Rapido told the Karnataka High Court that bike taxi services are legal under central law and the state’s lack of policy cannot justify a ban. They argue the single judge overstepped legal boundaries.
The Supreme Court has referred to a larger bench the question of whether insurance companies must pay no-fault compensation under Section 163A of the MV Act for the vehicle owner’s death, even without a third-party claim. The case arose from a minor’s plea after losing her parents in a solo accident.
Karnataka High Court hears Uber, Rapido, and Ola’s appeal against the state’s bike taxi ban. Counsel argues aggregation is legal and benefits traffic, consumers, and last-mile connectivity.
Today, On 10th July, OLA has appealed to the Karnataka High Court, arguing that the state’s ban on bike taxis infringes on the fundamental right to conduct trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, as upheld by a single bench ruling.
Today, On 4th July, In the bike taxi appeal, Ola told the Karnataka High Court it was “seeking registration under the MV Act only,” stressing that no policy existed and the State ignored Court directions and their earlier representation.
Today, On 4th July, Tamil Nadu has approached the Supreme Court against the Madras High Court’s stay on nine laws passed with the Governor’s deemed assent. The apex court agreed to hear the plea, citing its earlier April 8 ruling.
Delhi petrol dealers move High Court against prosecution for refuelling old vehicles. They argue the government unfairly burdens pump owners under ELV fuel ban rules.
