The Supreme Court enhanced compensation to Rs 82.83 lakh for a 21-year-old man in a vegetative state, overturning the Madras High Court’s unjust reduction in the motor accident claim.
The Supreme Court has referred to a larger bench the question of whether insurance companies must pay no-fault compensation under Section 163A of the MV Act for the vehicle owner’s death, even without a third-party claim. The case arose from a minor’s plea after losing her parents in a solo accident.
The Supreme Court clarified that it does not have the authority to set speed limits on roads, leaving this task to government experts. It overturned a Madras High Court decision that reduced a speed limit and emphasized that courts cannot change speed regulations in response to accidents. Speed limits are defined by the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and MoRTH guidelines.
