The Supreme Court held that financial control by a husband is a social reality and does not amount to criminal cruelty without proven mental or physical harm. Quashing a Section 498A case, the Court said criminal law cannot be used to settle personal vendettas.
The Bombay High Court dismissed actor Nawazuddin Siddiqui’s Rs 100 crore defamation suit against his brother Shamsuddin and his wife after the actor and his lawyer were absent during the hearing. Lawyers for Shamsuddin said the case was “baseless” and aimed to pressure their client over financial disputes.
Supreme Court dissolves IPS officer’s marriage using Article 142 and orders unconditional apology for filing 15 cases. All litigations quashed; both parties agree to move on peacefully.
The Supreme Court advised the Balakot fighter pilot and his wife, involved in a bitter matrimonial dispute, to forgive each other and move on. “Do not lead a life of revenge, just forgive and forget,” it said.
Kerala High Court grants bail to IB officer Sukanth Suresh after 44 days in jail. He was accused of abetting his girlfriend’s suicide under false promise of marriage.
The Mumbai Consumer Court has ruled against SpiceJet for negligent behavior, ordering the airline to pay Rs 25,000 to a senior citizen. The airline issued incorrect tickets during flight rescheduling in 2020, causing mental distress and financial loss to the passenger. The case highlights the legal responsibility of service providers.
The Supreme Court said that small taunts by in-laws towards a wife are a part of normal family life and do not count as cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC. It also said that courts should be careful while accepting such claims, especially during divorce cases.
A photographer in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, died by suicide, leaving a note alleging dowry law misuse. His wife and three of her family members have been charged with abetment. The incident created concerns over the alleged misuse of dowry laws. Police are investigating the case further.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed a husband’s plea to return his pregnant wife from her friend, respecting her choice to remain with her. The court found no illegal confinement, as the woman reported mental and physical harassment by her husband, leading to her decision to leave and seek freedom.
The Bombay High Court ruled that keeping a mother’s four-year-old daughter away from her is “cruelty” under IPC Section 498-A. Despite a lower court’s custody order, the child is withheld, causing mental harassment. The court upheld an FIR against the mother’s in-laws, emphasizing ongoing mental injury and contempt of judicial orders.
