The Bombay High Court observed that Hindu marriages, considered sacrosanct, are increasingly being jeopardized due to trivial issues between couples.
Bombay High Court ruled that an under-construction flat not in possession of either spouse doesn’t qualify as a “shared household” under the DV Act. Hence, the husband cannot be forced to pay pending EMIs.
Today, On 11th June, In a strong observation, the Supreme Court called the daughter’s accusations “shocking” and refused to quash the criminal case, citing the seriousness of the sexual assault allegations against the retired judge.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that a woman’s previous marriage is irrelevant for determining interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The court ordered her husband to pay Rs 15,000 per month, emphasizing financial necessity over allegations of deceit or past marital status in maintenance decisions.
The Bombay High Court has directed a woman to provide her voice sample in a domestic dispute case. This move aims to verify her husband’s claim of an extra-marital affair through electronic evidence.
The Supreme Court of India quashed an FIR against a man, filed by his estranged wife, claiming false representation about his medical qualifications and skin condition. The court found the allegations baseless, noting the wife was aware of her husband’s qualifications prior to their marriage, deeming the case an abuse of legal process.
The Delhi High Court made it clear that the child’s education and welfare must come first, even if the parents are separated or are fighting over custody. NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court ruled that schools cannot refuse to give a Transfer Certificate (TC) to a student just because the parents are having a matrimonial […]
The Supreme Court has referred Prasanna Sankar and Dhivya Sashidhar’s high-profile marital dispute for mediation. The case gained attention after Sankar’s viral tweets alleging harassment and custody conflict. New Delhi: On Friday, the Supreme Court of India sent the matrimonial dispute between Prasanna Sankar, co-founder of tech company Rippling, and his wife Dhivya Sashidhar for […]
The Supreme Court of India condemned a Dubai court’s travel ban on a minor child during a matrimonial dispute, labeling it a violation of human rights. The court emphasized the child’s welfare, supporting the Karnataka High Court’s ruling to allow local family court handling. The case involves custody claims by the father and allegations of abuse by the mother.
The Supreme Court of India has decided to mediate a high-profile matrimonial dispute between Prasanna Sankar and his wife, Dhivya Sashidhar. Allegations of abusive messages, false police reports, and custody issues have emerged, with both parties denying accusations against each other and claiming mutual agreements regarding their child’s custody.
