Supreme Court Refuses to Quash Sexual Assault Case Against Former Judge: “Shocking Allegations”

Today, On 11th June, In a strong observation, the Supreme Court called the daughter’s accusations “shocking” and refused to quash the criminal case, citing the seriousness of the sexual assault allegations against the retired judge.

Wife’s Past Marriage Can’t Block Maintenance: Allahabad HC’s Big Ruling

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a woman’s previous marriage is irrelevant for determining interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The court ordered her husband to pay Rs 15,000 per month, emphasizing financial necessity over allegations of deceit or past marital status in maintenance decisions.

Bombay HC Orders Woman to Give Voice Sample in Husband’s Affair Allegation Case

The Bombay High Court has directed a woman to provide her voice sample in a domestic dispute case. This move aims to verify her husband’s claim of an extra-marital affair through electronic evidence.

Supreme Court Quashes Rape FIR, Terms Wife’s Allegations Over Husband’s Skin Condition and Qualification as ‘Abuse of Law’

The Supreme Court of India quashed an FIR against a man, filed by his estranged wife, claiming false representation about his medical qualifications and skin condition. The court found the allegations baseless, noting the wife was aware of her husband’s qualifications prior to their marriage, deeming the case an abuse of legal process.

Delhi High Court: Schools Cannot Deny Transfer Certificate Due to Parents’ Matrimonial Dispute

The Delhi High Court made it clear that the child’s education and welfare must come first, even if the parents are separated or are fighting over custody. NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court ruled that schools cannot refuse to give a Transfer Certificate (TC) to a student just because the parents are having a matrimonial […]

Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar’s Matrimonial Case: SC Refers Mediation, Appoints Ex-Madras HC Judge Kirubakaran As Mediator

The Supreme Court has referred Prasanna Sankar and Dhivya Sashidhar’s high-profile marital dispute for mediation. The case gained attention after Sankar’s viral tweets alleging harassment and custody conflict. New Delhi: On Friday, the Supreme Court of India sent the matrimonial dispute between Prasanna Sankar, co-founder of tech company Rippling, and his wife Dhivya Sashidhar for […]

“Any Court Believes in Human Rights Would Not Pass Any Such Order”: Supreme Court Criticises Dubai Court’s Travel Ban on Child

The Supreme Court of India condemned a Dubai court’s travel ban on a minor child during a matrimonial dispute, labeling it a violation of human rights. The court emphasized the child’s welfare, supporting the Karnataka High Court’s ruling to allow local family court handling. The case involves custody claims by the father and allegations of abuse by the mother.

Supreme Court Directs Mediation in Dispute Between Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar and Wife

The Supreme Court of India has decided to mediate a high-profile matrimonial dispute between Prasanna Sankar and his wife, Dhivya Sashidhar. Allegations of abusive messages, false police reports, and custody issues have emerged, with both parties denying accusations against each other and claiming mutual agreements regarding their child’s custody.

Supreme Court Grants Divorce After 17 Years of Separation, Orders Rs 40 Lakh Alimony

The Supreme Court of India granted divorce to a couple who had been separated for 17 years after 14 months of marriage, citing irretrievable breakdown and an impossible reconciliation. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs 40 lakh as permanent alimony, considering their lengthy legal battles and lack of children.

Bombay HC Notice to State on Plea for Lawyers in Custody Battles: “Child’s Voice Remains Unheard, Needs and Well-Being Side Lined”

The Bombay High Court issued a notice to the Maharashtra government on a plea seeking legal representation for children in custody battles. The petition argues that minors should have independent lawyers to voice their interests in family court disputes. The court has sought the state’s response on implementing such a provision. This move aims to ensure that children’s welfare is prioritized in parental custody conflicts.