The Supreme Court ruled that a husband’s financial dominance in a strained marriage does not amount to cruelty. Disputes over expenses reflect “the daily wear and tear of marriage” and do not fall under Section 498 IPC.
The Supreme Court observed that it is increasingly burdened with matrimonial and bail cases, cautioning that handling such matters could flood the apex court with divorce petitions from across India. The remark came while hearing an Army officer’s plea seeking intervention in a delayed matrimonial case.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, while hearing an appeal, has taken up the question of whether a Jain individual can seek relief under the Hindu Marriage Act. The case revolves around a matrimonial dispute, including divorce by mutual consent. The court’s decision could have significant legal implications for Jain marriages. A ruling on the matter is expected after further deliberation.
Today, On 29th January, The Supreme Court requested the Centre to provide data on the total number of FIRs registered under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The court was hearing multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Act, which makes the practice of Triple Talaq a criminal offense.