The Karnataka High Court, while denying bail to a man accused of rape, invoked the Manusmriti and Mahatma Gandhi’s words, stressing that where women are respected, divinity thrives, but dishonour renders all deeds meaningless.
Rahul Gandhi has criticized the RSS for questioning the terms “secular” and “socialist” in the Constitution’s Preamble, accusing them of favoring the Manusmriti agenda. He claims the RSS aims to undermine the rights of marginalized groups and has warned them against their intentions. The controversy follows an RSS demand for debate on these terms.
Rahul Gandhi’s parliamentary speech critiqued the BJP government by contrasting the Indian Constitution with the Manusmriti, referencing Hindutva figure Savarkar. He accused the ruling party of dishonoring Savarkar’s legacy while defending constitutional values. His remarks ignited controversy over Savarkar’s historical role, with strong reactions from both Congress and BJP supporters.
Minister Pradhan stated to Media that while initial proposals were discussed, they did not receive endorsement from the Academic Council during its recent meeting. Vice-Chancellor Singh confirmed the rejection, emphasizing the university’s commitment to constitutional principles and a forward-looking educational approach. NEW DELHI: Today (12th July): Following widespread criticism, the addition of the ancient Hindu […]
The ancient text Manusmriti has been introduced into the University of Delhi’s Faculty of Law curriculum, sparking controversy. Despite criticism for endorsing the caste system and gender inequality, faculty members argue for its inclusion for a critical comparative perspective. However, students express concern about potential societal division and discrimination in a modern, democratic society.
The Rajasthan High Court, in a landmark judgment, emphasized the profound impact of rape, particularly on minors, and the need for substantial compensation. Citing ancient Indian texts, the court underscored the importance of respecting women. The ruling directed the payment of Rs. 3,00,000 compensation to the victim’s daughter and has wider implications for minor rape victims before 2009.
