Opposing bail, Delhi Police told the High Court that smuggling inflammable material inside Parliament smoke canisters to terrorise MPs was intolerable and dangerous. Police said Manoranjan D and Sagar Sharma were lead conspirators whose acts triggered live chaos nationwide.
Delhi High Court pulls up accused in Parliament security breach case, says disrupting Parliament is the “best way to create terror”, asks police to respond to bail plea.
Today, On 2nd July, The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat, accused in the December 13, 2023 Parliament security breach case. The incident had sparked major security concerns within the nation’s highest legislative body.
Today, On 2nd July, The Delhi High Court is set to pronounce its decision on the bail pleas of two accused in the December 2023 Parliament security breach case. The incident had raised serious concerns over national security lapses.
Today, On 21st May, In the December 2023 Parliament security breach case, the Delhi Police told the High Court that they had “duly supplied” the arrest grounds to the accused, countering allegations of procedural lapses in the high-profile matter.
Today, 29th April, The Delhi High Court will hear the bail plea of the accused in the Parliament security breach case on May 7. The incident had triggered serious concerns over security lapses within the parliamentary complex.
The Delhi High Court is set to hear Neelam Azad’s bail plea on April 29 related to the 2023 Parliament security breach. The court questioned if using a non-lethal smoke canister qualifies as a terrorist act under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Prosecution labeled the actions as grave threats to India’s sovereignty.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Delhi Police to respond to a bail plea filed by one of the accused in the Parliament security breach case of December 13, 2023. A bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Anup Jairam Bhambhani issued a notice to the police regarding the petition filed by Manoranjan D. He had challenged a trial court’s decision that refused him bail.
Today, 25th April,Delhi Police granted an additional month by the court to investigate the recent security breach at Parliament, highlighting concerns about safety measures. The decision followed a formal request citing the need to examine witnesses and pending reports, with the court allowing accused individuals to interact with family via video conferencing. This extension adds 45 days to the investigation timeframe.
In a recent development concerning the Parliament security breach case, the Delhi High Court has agreed to hear a plea by the city police challenging a trial court’s directive to provide a copy of the First Information Report (FIR) to one of the accused. This decision comes amidst heightened scrutiny and legal proceedings following a […]
