The Madras High Court will pronounce its verdict on January 27 on CBFC’s appeal challenging the order granting a U/A 16+ certificate to Vijay’s Jana Nayagan. The case raises key questions on CBFC Chairman’s powers and procedural fairness in film certification.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court struck down the State’s directive to collect sensitive social background data of Model School students, holding that gathering such information without purpose violates privacy rights and discriminates against marginalised students.
The Madras High Court has reserved orders on actor and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam founder Vijay’s plea challenging a Rs 1.5 crore income tax penalty for alleged non-disclosure of income during the 2015-16 assessment year. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy fixed date.
Madras High Court denied the State’s plea to cancel Savukku Shankar’s interim bail but imposed stricter conditions to prevent misuse, including a complete ban on public commentary and restricted movement. The court also ordered a fresh medical examination.
The Madras High Court strongly objected to allegations of judicial bias made during the hearing on the cancellation of the interim bail granted to YouTuber-journalist Savukku Shankar. The court warned that mudslinging against judges would not be tolerated.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that calling for the “eradication” of Sanatana Dharma carries genocidal implications and constitutes hate speech, while quashing the FIR against BJP leader Amit Malviya for his critical X post.
The Madras High Court refused anticipatory bail to a man accused of sexual relations on a false promise of marriage, observing that women in live-in relationships are trapped in a “web of modernity and culture” and directing the invocation of Section 69 of the BNS.
The Madras High Court, hearing the Jana Nayagan censor dispute, said filmmakers cannot seek relief citing a Rs 500 crore investment. The court observed the single judge directing a UA certificate failed to properly examine the Vijay-starrer’s case thoroughly.
The Madras High Court set aside a 2010 Trade Marks Registry order, holding ‘nandini’ for agarbattis deceptively similar to KMF’s ‘NANDINI’ dairy trademark. Justice N Anand Venkatesh ruled the phonetic identity and presentation could mislead consumers.
Today, on 15th January 2026, Supreme Court refused to interfere in a producer’s plea over delayed film certification, despite senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi’s submissions. He alleged CBFC acted mala fide, claiming release plans across 5,000 theatres while certification with ten cuts was promised earlier.
