The Madhya Pradesh government has dismissed viral claims that its Supreme Court affidavit on OBC reservation contained derogatory caste remarks, calling them “false, fabricated, misleading, and motivated by malafide intent.” It warned of strict action against those spreading such misinformation.
Today, On 28th February, The Supreme Court ordered the reappointment of civil judges in Madhya Pradesh and asked for more respect towards women judges. It said that women judges should get a safe and comfortable place to work. The Court also stressed that a supportive environment is important for equal opportunities in the judiciary. This decision shows the Court’s commitment to fairness and justice for all.
The Supreme Court dismissed an NGO’s plea regarding poor conditions in Madhya Pradesh government schools, directing the NGO to approach the High Court instead. The petition highlighted unsafe infrastructure, lack of hygiene, insufficient teachers, and inadequate facilities, emphasizing violations of students’ educational rights, and prompting concerns about the state’s responsibilities in education.
The Supreme Court Today (Sept 3) came down heavily on the Madhya Pradesh government for keeping an undertrial accused in jail for eight years in connection with a chit-fund fraud case. While hearing a bail plea by the accused, Justice JB Pardiwala questioned the state’s actions, particularly given the ongoing trial.
The Supreme Court ruled that meritorious SC/ST, OBC, and EWS candidates can be considered under the horizontal quota, overriding Madhya Pradesh government’s objections. The decision mandates such candidates with scores surpassing the general category cut-offs to be considered for MBBS Unreserved Government School quota. The court emphasized equitable admissions based on merit and overturned the High Court’s ruling.
Today, On 16th August, A civil rights group, Social Jurist, urged Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud to address the poor state of state-run schools in Madhya Pradesh, citing inadequate infrastructure, lack of teachers, unhygienic conditions, and violation of students’ rights. The letter emphasized the need for modern facilities and requested judicial intervention for necessary reforms.
Today, On 9th July, The Supreme Court highlighted public unawareness of the increased age of consent for sexual intercourse, now raised to 18 years from 16. Challenges in enforcing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act were noted, particularly in cases of consensual relationships involving young girls. This lack of awareness necessitates focused educational initiatives to address the issue.
Today (22nd March) The Supreme Court set guidelines for Lokayukta appointments, emphasizing the need for meaningful consultation with opposition leaders. This follows a plea contesting the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta’s appointment without Leader of the Opposition consultation. The court aims to ensure transparency and statutory compliance in such appointments nationwide. The plea challenges the appointment’s transparency and demands its annulment.
Today (on 5th March): The Madhya Pradesh government has informed the Supreme Court about its measures to combat hate speech, including the appointment of nodal officers and setting up social media cells to monitor and remove hate speech content. This action follows the Supreme Court’s directive, with district cyber cells actively monitoring social media platforms under the government’s directive.
The Supreme Court of India has taken suo motu cognizance of the termination of six female judges by the Madhya Pradesh government, based on unsatisfactory performance during their probation period. The affected judges argue that the termination violated their fundamental rights and point to inconsistencies in their evaluation. This case highlights gender-related challenges in the judiciary.