The Madhya Pradesh government has dismissed viral claims that its Supreme Court affidavit on OBC reservation contained derogatory caste remarks, calling them “false, fabricated, misleading, and motivated by malafide intent.” It warned of strict action against those spreading such misinformation.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court sparked controversy with remarks suggesting India should align with majority views, referencing the Uniform Civil Code. His speech included derogatory comments about extremists and raised concerns regarding his impartiality. Criticism arose from legal experts about his commitment to constitutional values and judicial independence.
A BSP candidate, Kushwaha Shivpujan Mehta, filed a legal complaint against Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, accusing him of disturbing communal harmony during an election rally. Sarma’s remarks about potentially naming a newly elevated district after Hindu deities sparked concerns over rising communal tensions, emphasizing the need for responsible political discourse.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed Mohammad Bilal’s plea to quash an FIR for allegedly making offensive remarks about Lord Ram and Hinduism on Instagram. Despite claiming his account was hacked, the court found his defense unconvincing. The case will proceed for further investigation under relevant laws.
The Rajasthan High Court raised concerns about the impact of the Pran Pratishtha Mahotsav celebrations on public order and access to essential services. The Court emphasized the need for upholding the ideals of Lord Ram while ensuring that religious festivities do not obstruct the administration of justice. This incident highlights the delicate balance between religious reverence and civic responsibilities.
