![[Live-in' Partner's Dowry Death] "Evidence Shows Applicant & Deceased Lived as Husband & Wife, Even if Not Legally Married": HC Rejects Man's Plea Challenging Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-9-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Allahabad High Court upheld a decision dismissing a man’s plea related to a dowry death case involving his live-in partner, confirming that proof of cohabitation as husband and wife suffices for legal accountability. The man’s arguments were found unmeritorious, reinforcing the trial court’s conclusion regarding the applicability of IPC provisions.
The Uttarakhand High Court has revoked a directive requiring an interfaith couple in a live-in relationship to register under the yet-to-be-implemented Uniform Civil Code (UCC) of Uttarakhand. The court had earlier granted police protection on this condition but modified the order after learning that the UCC had not been notified despite Presidential assent.
![[Shraddha Walkar Murder Case] Delhi HC Denies Accused's Plea for Fixing Trial Dates](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-24-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 30th July, The Delhi High Court declined to grant a fixed trial schedule as requested by the accused in the Shraddha Walkar murder case. The court emphasized the need for the defense to adjust to the trial court’s schedule and advised the defense lawyer to request accommodations for cross-examinations. The accused faces charges of murder and evidence tampering.
![[Shraddha Walkar Murder Case] Court Rejects Aftab Poonawala's Plea for Trial, Twice a Month](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-2024-07-22T200127.608.png?resize=400%2C225&ssl=1)
Today, On 22nd July, Delhi court denies Aftab Poonawala’s bid for bi-monthly trials in Shraddha Walkar murder case, citing potential delay tactics. The accused sought more time for counsel preparation. Court also rejects immediate release of victim’s bones for cremation, prioritizing the prosecution’s need for evidence. The defendant faces charges under Indian Penal Code sections.
The Uttarakhand High Court granted police protection to an interfaith couple in a live-in relationship, provided they register their relationship under the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) within 48 hours. The Court’s decision referenced the Supreme Court’s judgment in Lata Singh v. State of UP, which offers protection to interfaith couples. The UCC in Uttarakhand mandates registration for live-in couples.
The Jharkhand High Court upheld the dismissal of a married police constable for being in a live-in relationship with a woman other than his wife. Despite his acquittal in a rape case filed by his live-in partner, the Court ruled that his behavior violated service rules and warranted dismissal. The case underscores the strict standards for police personnel.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a woman cohabiting with a man for a considerable period is entitled to financial maintenance upon separation, even without legal marriage. This decision, upheld by Justice JS Ahluwalia, sets a precedent for recognizing the rights of women in non-formalized partnerships to seek financial support.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court fined a married teacher Rs. 50,000 for seeking legal protection in his live-in relationship with a 19-year-old student, emphasizing the misuse of legal processes in personal relationship matters. The court’s decision aims to deter educators from abusing the law and upholds the sanctity of marriage.