The Rajasthan High Court said that two consenting adults have the right to live in a relationship even without attaining the legal marriageable age. The Court stressed that Article 21 protects such personal choices and ensures freedom and safety.
The Allahabad High Court has ordered police protection for an interfaith live-in couple after their minor daughter reported threats from her mother’s former in-laws. Citing Supreme Court rulings, the court affirmed that live-in relationships between consenting adults are legal, and directed police to ensure the couple’s safety and register their complaints.
![[Live-in' Partner's Dowry Death] "Evidence Shows Applicant & Deceased Lived as Husband & Wife, Even if Not Legally Married": HC Rejects Man's Plea Challenging Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-9-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Allahabad High Court upheld a decision dismissing a man’s plea related to a dowry death case involving his live-in partner, confirming that proof of cohabitation as husband and wife suffices for legal accountability. The man’s arguments were found unmeritorious, reinforcing the trial court’s conclusion regarding the applicability of IPC provisions.
The Uttarakhand High Court has revoked a directive requiring an interfaith couple in a live-in relationship to register under the yet-to-be-implemented Uniform Civil Code (UCC) of Uttarakhand. The court had earlier granted police protection on this condition but modified the order after learning that the UCC had not been notified despite Presidential assent.
![[Shraddha Walkar Murder Case] Delhi HC Denies Accused's Plea for Fixing Trial Dates](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-24-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 30th July, The Delhi High Court declined to grant a fixed trial schedule as requested by the accused in the Shraddha Walkar murder case. The court emphasized the need for the defense to adjust to the trial court’s schedule and advised the defense lawyer to request accommodations for cross-examinations. The accused faces charges of murder and evidence tampering.
![[Shraddha Walkar Murder Case] Court Rejects Aftab Poonawala's Plea for Trial, Twice a Month](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-2024-07-22T200127.608.png?resize=400%2C225&ssl=1)
Today, On 22nd July, Delhi court denies Aftab Poonawala’s bid for bi-monthly trials in Shraddha Walkar murder case, citing potential delay tactics. The accused sought more time for counsel preparation. Court also rejects immediate release of victim’s bones for cremation, prioritizing the prosecution’s need for evidence. The defendant faces charges under Indian Penal Code sections.