‘Is It Correct?’: PIL in Delhi High Court Flags 650 Govt Lawyers Without AIBE; Court Seeks Centre’s Reply

A PIL in the Delhi High Court challenges the Centre’s appointment of over 650 advocates as government counsel, alleging many have not cleared the mandatory AIBE. The Court has asked the Centre to clarify the selection criteria before the next hearing on December 11.

Shocked and Petrified: Kerala High Court Aghast as Petitioner-Advocate Makes Obnoxious Remarks, Accuses Judges of Bias

The Kerala High Court expressed deep shock after a woman litigant, claiming to be a lawyer, made outrageous remarks against the judges during her hearing. The Bench said her statements breached all norms of civility and were deeply perverse.

Gurugram Bar Association Warns Non-Lawyers For Wearing Advocate-Like Court Attire: “Violation May Lead to Action & Rs.5000 Fine”

The Gurugram Bar Association has strictly warned non-lawyers against wearing advocate-like attire inside court premises, stating, “Violation May Lead to Action & Rs.5000 Fine,” and said only enrolled advocates and registered law interns may wear the professional dress.

BREAKING | Supreme Court Slams ‘Unethical’ Court Absenteeism: “Senior Advocate, Not Senior Excuse”

Today, On 4th June, The Supreme Court criticised the rising trend of newly designated senior advocates skipping ongoing cases. Justice Amanullah called it “highly unethical,” stressing that becoming a senior advocate means greater responsibility, not an excuse to avoid appearances.

Madras HC Appreciates Bar Council of India for Conducting Surprise Inspections in Law Colleges

The Madras High Court praised the Bar Council of India (BCI) for ensuring law colleges meet educational standards and commended its high-power committee for conducting surprise inspections. During a recent hearing, the court learned that the committee had inspected 22 institutions and submitted reports for 19.

J&K High Court: Lawyers Prohibited from Claiming Any Share in Litigation

Jammu and Kashmir High Court prohibits lawyers from taking clients’ compensation as fees, deeming it misconduct. A dispute arose when a litigant challenged her lawyer’s request for a share of her Rs. 13.5 lakh Lok Adalat compensation. The Court condemned such behavior and ordered prompt release of the compensation to the claimant.