The Allahabad High Court has scheduled the next hearing in the long-running Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah mosque dispute in Mathura for December 12, a case that continues to draw national attention over ownership and historical claims to the sacred site.
The Supreme Court of India issued a landmark ruling on November 5, determining that not all private property is a community resource. This decision prompted dissent from Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Sudhanshu Dhulia, who criticized the majority’s characterization of prior judicial doctrines, highlighting the importance of dissenting opinions in shaping legal interpretations and promoting transparency.
![[Criminalization Of Marital Rape] "We (Centre) Will Be Filing A Reply Soon, Don't Hear It This Week": SG Mehta Tells CJI](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-5-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Khushboo Saifi’s appeal to the Supreme Court focuses on the constitutional validity of the marital rape exception under Section 375 of the IPC. The Supreme Court will hear the case after the Centre submits its response. The Delhi High Court issued conflicting opinions on the exception, emphasizing the need for legal clarity on women’s rights in marriage.
The Delhi High Court today rejected Shashi Tharoor’s request to dismiss a criminal defamation case for comparing PM Modi to a scorpion. The court also lifted the interim order, directing the parties to appear before the trial court on September 10. Tharoor’s legal team argued that he was simply quoting someone else and that the complaint was baseless and frivolous.
The Hindu petitioners on Monday in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute argue that the Places of Worship Act does not apply to a disputed structure. They challenge the 1968 compromise and maintain that the suit is maintainable and that evidence needs to be presented. The lawsuit also revisits historical claims about the mosque’s existence. The legal and historical complexities are becoming more evident as the court postpones further discussions.
Today (13th May): The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea seeking an FIR against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for alleged communal speeches during the election campaign, deeming it “misconceived” and “without merit.” The court emphasized the Election Commission of India’s independent authority to handle the matter, stating that it cannot intervene in the ECI’s proceedings.