The Supreme Court Today (April 15th) dismissed a plea moved by two lawyers (petitioners) challenging a Gujarat High Court order to initiate a probe against them on suspicions that they forged a vakalatnama.
The SC Bar Association rallied to save a seven-year-old girl with Fanconi anemia, raising funds for her costly bone marrow transplant. Bar members donated ₹5 lakh, but there was still a ₹15 lakh shortfall. Senior lawyer Harish Salve pledged and transferred the remaining amount, ensuring the girl’s prompt treatment. This act showcased the Bar’s commitment to supporting its members in need.
The Chhattisgarh High Court expresses concern over the increase in derogatory remarks towards judges and lawyers by internet users, as court proceedings are more accessible through live-streaming. The court warns of strict action against those using contemptuous language, emphasizing the need for constructive criticism and the importance of faith in the justice system for upholding democracy.
The Supreme Court of India issued a notice to the Uttar Pradesh Government regarding non-functional CCTV cameras in a courtroom where Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia was assaulted, emphasizing the state’s accountability for court safety. The Court ordered the report to be widely circulated and condemned actions compromising legal proceedings, following an assault on Bhatia and Advocate Muskan Gupta.
![[Breaking] Apex Court Directs Delhi LG "Not Duty Bound" by Delhi Govt. Cabinet Advice for Appointment of Aldermen to MCD](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-04-190413.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi government today challenged the Centre’s decision to empower the Lieutenant Governor to appoint lawyers and determine their fees for representing the State. The Supreme Court sought responses from the Central government and the LG. The Delhi government argued that this undermines its autonomy and hampers its ability to advocate for the interests of Delhi’s electorate.
The Kerala High Court Advocates Association (KHCAA) expressed discontent with Justice A. Badharudeen’s treatment of lawyers, citing refusal to adjourn a case for a health concern and last-minute scheduling. They recommended universal video recording of court proceedings for transparency and fairness. The incident underscores the need for judicial reforms to enhance procedural fairness and transparency.
The Supreme Court on Thursday has been presented with a plea challenging the inclusion of advocate services under the ambit of the Consumer Protection Act. This case, represented by the Bar of Indian Lawyers, has sparked a significant debate on the nature of legal services and their classification as a consumer service. Also Read- Supreme […]
The Supreme Court of India is deliberating on whether legal representation should be categorized as a “service” under the Consumer Protection Act, potentially making lawyers accountable for shortcomings. This debate questions the unique professional standing of lawyers and could have far-reaching implications for lawyer-client dynamics. The decision is eagerly anticipated by the legal community and the public.
