Today, On 10th June, Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court collapsed while presiding over a case, but returned to work after receiving medical attention. Despite feeling unwell, he resumed his duties in the afternoon, attributing the incident to likely food poisoning. His commitment to his judicial responsibilities and resilience serve as an example to all.
In response to soaring temperatures in Delhi, several High Courts have temporarily exempted lawyers from wearing their traditional robes and coats. This move, prompted by extreme heat, aims to improve working conditions. There is a push for the Supreme Court to implement this relaxation nationwide. The situation underscores the need for adaptive measures in the legal system.
![[Electricity Crisis] Agartala Lawyers Protest on Street Over Continuous Power Cuts in Courts](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-27-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 29th May, Lawyers in Agartala protested prolonged power outages affecting the judicial system after Cyclone Remal. They detained a senior official and demanded immediate restoration of power. Despite the assurances from the Power Minister, the opposition party staged a demonstration, blaming the government for outsourcing power services, which led to the depletion of TSECL’s assets. The storm caused extensive damage, requiring significant time to fully restore electricity.
Today(on 8th May), The Uttarakhand High Court is considering relocating a bench to the IDPL campus in Rishikesh following a PIL against ex-employees’ residency. The bar association opposes the move, citing no substantial benefit. The court has requested a written proposal, reflecting a commitment to considering all viewpoints before making a decision with significant implications.
On 30th April: The Allahabad High Court has restrained two lawyers from entering the district court premises due to an alleged assault on a litigant. The court is taking strong measures to address the issue, including reviewing CCTV footage and evaluating security arrangements. This action underscores the court’s commitment to a fair and secure legal environment.
