A Turning Point for Legal Accessibility in India, Supreme Court on Friday has issued notices to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in response to a plea challenging the enrolment fees for lawyers The Supreme Court on Friday has issued notices to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in response to a plea challenging the […]
The Bombay High Court is taking strong action against three lawyers for their involvement in a false news report aimed at influencing a case. This underscores the importance of upholding legal integrity. The court’s decision to proceed with contempt of court proceedings reaffirms its commitment to upholding the law and maintaining the highest standards of behavior in the legal process.
The Kerala High Court Advocate’s Association, alongside its President and Secretary, has filed a plea highlighting instances of police harassment, assault, and false charges against lawyers. The High Court has called for the state’s response and the establishment of clear guidelines to safeguard legal professionals. This pivotal move aims to address the ongoing issue and reinforce respect for the rule of law.
Chief Justice Chandrachud emphasizes courtroom etiquette and professionalism in the Supreme Court, reprimanding lawyers for breaches of conduct. His commitment to upholding dignity and decorum serves as a reminder of the importance of etiquette and adherence to courtroom protocols, maintaining the sanctity of legal proceedings. Despite pushback, his stance remains unwavering.
A group of 281 lawyers has expressed concern over the Supreme Court’s decision to halt the practice of circulating adjournment letters one day before a case is listed. The move was met with resistance from legal associations, leading to the formation of a judges’ committee to develop a new procedure. The decision’s impact on court proceedings is being closely monitored.
The Supreme Court of India recently concluded a contempt of court case against the former office-bearers of the Bharatpur Bar Association, Rajasthan, who were accused of obstructing the work of lawyers who did not participate in calls for strikes and boycotts of courts. The bench, comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS […]
