Legal Education Still Grappling to Meet 21st Century Demands: Ex-CJI Chandrachud

Former CJI D Y Chandrachud said India’s legal education system has major gaps despite producing top lawyers. He urged reforms, tech skills, and mental health support for the profession.

Chandigarh Police Register FIR Law Intern Goes Missing from High Court Premises

Following the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s direction, Chandigarh Police have registered an FIR after a 21-year-old law intern went missing from the court premises on March 17. The matter has raised serious safety concerns.

Bombay High Court Rejects PIL Against BCI’s Criminal Background Check, CCTV Rule for Law Students

The Bombay High Court Today (Feb 10) refused to hear a PIL challenging the Bar Council of India’s (BCI) rule requiring law students to undergo criminal background checks before receiving their final marksheets. Advocate Ashok Yende argued that the rule violates privacy and is beyond BCI’s powers. However, the Court stated that having a criminal case does not prevent students from pursuing legal education. The matter is also pending before the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Seeks BCI Reply on Plea Against Mandatory Criminal Background Checks, CCTV in Law Colleges

In September 2024, the BCI issued a notification mandating strict new measures for all Centers of Legal Education (CLEs) across the country. NEW DELHI: On Friday. The Supreme Court of India has asked the Bar Council of India (BCI) to respond to petitions challenging two circulars issued by the bar body in September 2024. These […]

Orissa High Court Quashes Ragging Case, Directs Law Students to Teach at Orphanage For One Weeks

Cuttack, Orissa: The Orissa High Court has quashed a ragging case against law students after a settlement was reached between the complainant and the accused. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra, presiding over the case, noted the inappropriate behavior of the law students.

Plea in Delhi High Court to Remove Court Order from Indian Kanoon: “Freedom of Speech vs Right to Be Forgotten”

Today, On 8th January, A petition has been filed in the Delhi High Court seeking the removal of a court order from the Indian Kanoon website. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the order, accessible via Google, is harming his client’s reputation as a businessman. The plea emphasizes the impact on the petitioner’s credibility due to the public availability of the order. The court is expected to address concerns related to privacy and public access to legal records.

Connecting With The Cause || NALSA Launches Nationwide Competition for Law Students Led by Justice B.R. Gavai

NALSA has launched a national competition for law students called ‘Connecting with the Cause’ to promote legal awareness. The initiative encourages students to engage with legal issues and raise awareness about the importance of justice. The competition aims to inspire young lawyers to be more involved in serving society. It is a great opportunity for law students to contribute to social causes and strengthen their legal knowledge.

Karnataka High Court: Law Students Failing IPC Exam Not Expected To Give BNS Supplementary Exams

The Karnataka High Court, led by Justice Suraj Govindaraj, ruled that law students who failed the Indian Penal Code (IPC) exam cannot be forced to sit for supplementary exams in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which they were not taught. The court emphasized the need for students to take IPC exams instead.

BCI Mandates Disclosure of Criminal Records, Biometric Attendance, and CCTV Surveillance in Law Colleges

The Bar Council of India has introduced new guidelines for legal education centers to promote integrity and transparency. Key measures include mandatory criminal background checks for students, prohibition of simultaneous full-time degree enrollment, disclosure of employment status, strict attendance requirements, and implementation of biometric attendance systems and CCTV surveillance to ensure compliance.

‘No for 4-year LL.B’: Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain PIL

Today, 2nd May, The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL challenging the introduction of a four-year LL.B program, emphasizing that educational policy matters do not warrant judicial interference. The court highlighted the need for a broader legal education, incorporating non-legal subjects and understanding the interconnected nature of various fields. The petitioner withdrew the petition following the court’s indication of dismissal.