The Supreme Court resolved an ambiguous Chandigarh law officer exam question after conflicting High Court rulings. Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra held that determining which constitutional schedule is immune from judicial review is unsuitable for multiple-choice evaluation.
![[Spitting & Urinating in Food] Yogi Adityanath Proposes Strict Ordinances to Curb Unsafe Practices in UP](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-10-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Uttar Pradesh government, led by Yogi Adityanath, is introducing two ordinances to tackle unsanitary food practices, including spitting and contamination. These laws will impose strict penalties for offenders and ensure transparency in food handling for consumers. The measures aim to enhance food safety standards and bolster consumer protection in the state.
The Allahabad High Court has confirmed the decision of a single-judge bench from May, which ruled that the dismissal of the law officer and five faculty members from Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University was unlawful. Allahabad High Court has affirmed the reinstatement of a law officer and five faculty members at Dr. Shakuntala Misra […]
In a recent hearing of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) case, the Solicitor General of India voiced opposition to a 1981 parliamentary amendment granting minority status to AMU. This led to astonishment from the Chief Justice and a broader discussion on the role of law officers in supporting parliamentary amendments, raising complex constitutional law questions in India.