The Supreme Court of India stayed all ongoing and upcoming State judicial service examinations pending review of the controversial three-year legal practice requirement for entry-level judges, while hearing proceedings in Bhumika Trust v. Union of India mentioned urgently by petitioner Jayant Singh Yadav.
The Union Government of India informed the Supreme Court of India that certain persons deported to Bangladesh would be brought back for verification of citizenship status before authorities decide further action, following submissions made by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered a second post-mortem of Twisha Sharma by an All India Institute of Medical Sciences team in Bhopal, with Justice Avanindra Kumar Singh directing authorities to arrange a special flight for doctors urgently.
The Allahabad High Court quashed rape and assault proceedings, observing that long-standing consensual relationships cannot automatically be treated as rape after breakdown, while Justice Vivek Kumar Singh warned against misuse of criminal law and continuation of futile trials lacking evidence of deception from inception.
The Supreme Court of India indicated possible interim relief for Tasleem Ahmed and Khalid Saifi in the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots conspiracy case, telling senior advocate Rebecca John, “In all probability, you will get relief.”
The Bar Council of India approached the Supreme Court of India seeking approval for a merit-based co-option process to ensure 30% women representation in state bar councils, proposing selection of unelected women candidates securing the highest votes under a 10% additional quota.
The Supreme Court of India clarified that courts may proceed with sedition cases under Section 124A IPC if the accused raises no objection, while hearing a plea by an accused jailed for 17 years whose appeal remains pending before the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
The Allahabad High Court held that calling a husband “impotent” does not constitute defamation when supported by medical evidence, setting aside a summoning order after observing the wife acted in good faith and without malice, while criticising the trial court for inadequate factual assessment.
The Supreme Court of India refused to club 53 FIRs across seven states in a ₹49-crore investment scam case, questioning “What will happen to the rights of the victims,” while rejecting pleas filed by accused Upendra Nath Mishra and Kali Prasad Mishra.
The Allahabad High Court held that police cannot conduct further investigation without prior court permission and clarified that taking cognizance twice in the same criminal case after commencement of trial proceedings is legally impermissible, while deciding a plea filed by Syed Mohammad Hamza.
