The Ministry of Home Affairs has announced that the government has revoked the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk linked to the violence that broke out in Leh during protests in September last year.
Today, On 15th October, Ladakh activist Sonam Wangchuk’s wife, Gitanjali Angmo, told the Supreme Court, “I am being followed and under surveillance in Delhi constantly.” She said this surveillance infringes on her constitutional rights and began after her arrival on 30.09.2025.
The Supreme Court has fixed October 10, 2025, to hear applications demanding restoration of Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood after the abrogation of Article 370. Petitioners argue the Centre failed to honour its assurance despite Assembly elections and repeated Court directions.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court ruled that even a criminal has the right to sell their land. It clarified that pending cases cannot be used as a reason to withhold revenue records required for property sale.
Activist Sonam Wangchuk is arrested amid the Ladakh protest, with authorities invoking the National Security Act. The demonstration demands the implementation of the Sixth Schedule, raising legal, political, and social questions about regional autonomy and governance in Ladakh.
Statehood protest in Leh, Ladakh turned violent, leaving four dead in police firing and the BJP office set on fire. Activist Sonam Wangchuk, leading the movement, urged the youth to “stop this nonsense” amid rising tensions.
NALSA has postponed the National Lok Adalat in northern regions due to escalating tensions along the India-Pakistan border. Affected areas include Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh. Despite this, over 1.82 crore cases were resolved nationwide on May 10, highlighting the efficacy of Lok Adalats in facilitating dispute resolution.
The J&K and Ladakh High Court banned the term “divorcee” for women in legal cases, calling it derogatory. The court ordered all petitions using the word to be rejected and fined a petitioner Rs 20,000 for using it.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court recognized that the Bar Council of India guidelines do not permit female advocates to appear in court with their faces covered. This was highlighted after a claimant, Advocate Syed Ainain Qadri, refused to remove her covering. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the related case on December 13.
