The Supreme Court has issued a notice after bail was granted to a man accused of raping a minor. The case raises serious concerns over procedural lapses under the Juvenile Justice Act and POCSO provisions.
Gujarat High Court has refused to quash the FIR against a lawyer who disclosed a minor victim’s identity during media interviews. The Court said professional publicity cannot justify violating POCSO and Juvenile Justice laws.
The Supreme Court declined to hear a plea alleging custodial torture and sexual assault of a 17-year-old in Gujarat, asking the petitioner to first seek remedies before the High Court. The plea had sought an SIT or CBI probe, AIIMS medical report, and compensation.
Supreme Court sets aside Allahabad High Court and trial court orders declaring accused a juvenile; directs him to face murder trial as an adult based on medical and documentary evidence.
Supreme Court cancels jail term of rape convict after confirming he was a juvenile in 1988. His conviction remains valid, but further action will be decided by the Juvenile Justice Board.
The Kerala High Court dismissed the POCSO case against Asianet News, acknowledging the channel’s responsible reporting on drug abuse. The court stated that the channel “deserved recognition” for its work, and emphasized that no further proceedings would be pursued at the Special POCSO Court in Kozhikode.
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court granted bail to Vandana Kale, a woman accused of burning her seven-year-old niece after the child spent Rs 10 on chocolates from the Rs 50 given for grocery shopping.
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by Rajya Sabha MP and former Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) Chairperson Swati Maliwal. She had requested the court to cancel an FIR registered against her in 2016. The FIR accused her of revealing the identity of a 14-year-old rape survivor.
New Delhi, February 11: The Supreme Court of India has directed a court in Moradabad to decide within six months the appeal of Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan, son of Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan, in connection with a 2008 criminal case. A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal has also instructed the district and sessions court to consider Khan as a juvenile on the date of the alleged offense while deciding his appeal against the conviction.
The Supreme Court ordered the release of a convict in the 1994 triple murder case, noting he was a juvenile, just 14 years old, at the time of the crime. The apex court observed that he had already served over 25 years in prison. The decision was made under provisions of juvenile justice laws. This ruling highlights the court’s stance on rehabilitative justice for juveniles.
