Justice Shalinder Kaur, retiring from the Delhi High Court, reflected on her 30-year judicial journey, stressing compassion in adjudication. She dedicated her career to her father and thanked colleagues, mentors, and family.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an Indian Army officer who refused to participate in religious parades due to his Christian faith. The court emphasized the importance of military unity and discipline, stating that while religious beliefs are respected, collective participation is essential for camaraderie and morale in the armed forces.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has ruled that government authorities must provide “reasonable accommodation” in employment to people suffering from HIV. The court rejected the decision to deny promotion and appointment to three paramilitary personnel who tested positive for the virus. A bench led by Justice Navin Chawla, along with Justice Shalinder Kaur, ruled in favor of the petitioners. The court said that the HIV Act protects HIV-positive individuals from discrimination in employment. Authorities can refuse reasonable accommodation only if they can “certify” that doing so would cause administrative or financial hardship.
New Delhi, March 27– The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to Lieutenant Governor (LG) V K Saxena regarding a plea filed by activist Medha Patkar. She has requested permission to examine a new witness in a defamation case she filed against Saxena in the year 2000. Medha Patkar, the leader of the Narmada Bachao Andolan, had filed a defamation case against Saxena for allegedly publishing a defamatory advertisement. At that time, Saxena was the head of a Gujarat-based NGO.
![[Unnao Rape Case] Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail to Kuldeep Singh Sengar for Cataract Surgery](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Unnao-Rape-Case-Delhi-High-Court-Grants-Interim-Bail-To-Kuldeep-Singh-Sengar-For-Medical-Treatment-At-AIIMS-Delhi.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court Today affirmed the order for Bloomberg to retract a report alleging a $241 million accounting irregularity at Zee Entertainment. The court demanded immediate compliance, rejecting Bloomberg’s plea for a delay. Zee’s legal representative criticized the lack of evidence supporting the allegations, highlighting the clash between corporate accountability and journalistic freedom.
On 7th March, The Delhi High Court reserved judgment on Bloomberg’s appeal against a directive to withdraw a report alleging a $241 million accounting anomaly at Zee Entertainment. Both parties presented their arguments, emphasizing the controversy’s impact on media freedom and business interests. The court’s impending decision will have significant implications for the involved parties and media industry at large.
The Delhi High Court recently accepted the apology of an engineer, Brijesh Shukla, who had made derogatory remarks against the judiciary. The division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Shalinder Kaur considered the context of Shukla’s actions, acknowledging that his allegations against a judicial officer and the judiciary were likely a result of […]