Delhi High Court Slaps Rs.50k Costs on Litigants for False Bias Claim: Figment of Infertile Imagination

Delhi High Court imposed Rs.50,000 costs on litigants for fabricating a false bias claim against a trial judge, terming it a “figment of infertile imagination,” while stressing that misleading assertions cannot be allowed to derail judicial proceedings.

Blatant Liar: Justice Saurabh Banerjee Slams Lawyer’s False Claim of Relation in Delhi High Court

Justice Saurabh Banerjee of the Delhi High Court strongly criticised a lawyer for falsely claiming relation with another lawyer, calling her a “blatant liar” in open court, warning of debarment and strict action to protect judicial integrity.

Delhi High Court Halts CDSCO Prosecution Order Against IndiaMART in Illegal Drug Listings Case

The Delhi High Court has stayed CDSCO’s order to prosecute IndiaMART for allegedly listing illegal drugs, granting the e-commerce platform interim relief. The matter will be heard again on September 17, 2025.

Delhi High Court Allows To Keep ‘ELFY’ Trademark to Indian Businessman After 12-Year Battle with Pakistani Claimant

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Indian businessman Vidya Bhushan Jain in a trademark dispute against Pakistani trader Mohamad Younus Sheikh over the brand name ‘ELFY’. The court set aside a previous order from the Intellectual Property Appellate Board and allowed Jain’s trademark registration to continue, resolving the long-standing case.

Delhi High Court Imposes Rs 20,000 Cost on IP Authority for Repeated Adjournments in IPR Case, Orders Deposit to Army Welfare Fund

The Delhi High Court fined the Intellectual Property authority Rs 20,000 for repeatedly requesting adjournments in an IPR case. The penalty must be paid to the Army Central Welfare Fund within four weeks. The Court emphasized that such delays waste time and hinder justice, urging parties to avoid unnecessary extensions in legal proceedings.

Delhi High Court to Hear Tesla’s Trademark Case Against Indian Firm After Mediation Fails

NEW DELHI: Today, 26th March, The Delhi High Court decided to continue hearing the trademark case filed by Elon Musk’s company, Tesla Inc., against the Indian firm Tesla Power India Private Limited. This decision came after the Court noted that mediation efforts between the two companies did not succeed.

Delhi HC Issues Notice on Plea Against Trademark Registration: “Add ‘Osho’ to Prohibited Marks List”

Today, On 26th March, A plea filed in the Delhi High Court seeking a ban on the registration of trademarks using the name “Osho.” The court has requested responses from the Central government and the Trademark Registry regarding the matter. The petition was submitted by Osho Friends International, an association of the philosopher Osho’s disciples. The case could impact the commercial use of Osho’s name and legacy.

Delhi HC Rules on Maternity Benefits for Legal Aid Lawyers

The Delhi High Court ruled that legal aid lawyers are entitled to maternity benefits under the Maternity Benefit Act without discrimination based on employment type. The court overturned a single-judge decision and emphasized the distinction between advocates and employees. The ruling clarified that contractual legal aid counsel are not eligible for maternity benefits.

Delhi High Court Halts ED Probe Against Hero MotoCorp’s Pawan Munjal

In a significant legal development, the Delhi High Court has ordered a stay on the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) investigation against Pawan Munjal, the Executive Chairman of Hero MotoCorp. This decision comes in the wake of allegations involving the illegal transfer of foreign currency equivalent to ₹54 crore out of India by Munjal and others. Also […]

Delhi High Court Advocates Settlement Through Community Service: Parties to Clean Police Stations and Donate for Uniforms.

In a recent turn of events, the Delhi High Court, under the guidance of Justice Saurabh Banerjee, quashed a First Information Report (FIR) related to an attempt to commit culpable homicide. This decision came after the involved parties reached a settlement. Justice Banerjee remarked, “In view of the fact that the settlement has been arrived […]