The Supreme Court refused to interfere with its earlier judgment cancelling over 23,000 West Bengal SSC appointments, asking affected candidates to approach the Calcutta High Court. The Court reiterated that only untainted candidates may seek limited relief while ensuring “tainted candidates” do not re-enter the system.
Today, On 22nd September, The Supreme Court, while hearing The Wire’s plea in a defamation case filed by ex-JNU professor Amita Singh, said, “Time has come to decriminalise all this,” tagging it with Rahul Gandhi’s pending matter.
The Supreme Court declined to de-tag Elvish Yadav’s plea to quash the snake venom case from the complainant’s police protection plea. Both matters will continue to be heard together, with replies to the State’s counter due before the next hearing.
The Supreme Court has refused video conferencing in the Ahmedabad blasts appeals, citing grave security risks to judges and witnesses. The Court directed the Gujarat HC to ensure uninterrupted in-person arguments for defence counsel.
Today, On 23rd July, In a misconduct case involving AoR P Soma Sundaram and another lawyer, the Supreme Court ruled in their favour after a split verdict. The Court observed, “Majesty of law lies not in punishing but forgiving.”
Today, On 4th June, The Supreme Court rejected the Delhi Waqf Board’s claim over a Delhi Gurdwara, stating, “You should relinquish the claim.” The Board had said the mosque, “Masjid Takia Babbar Shah,” existed since time immemorial for religious use.
The Supreme Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for interfering in a private dispute over the management of the Shri Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan. The Court warned such interference undermines the rule of law, emphasizing the government should not involve itself in private legal matters. The Court firmly rejected the government’s attempts to hijack the case.
The Supreme Court of India urged a divorcing couple to meet for dinner to resolve their issues amicably, emphasizing the importance of their three-year-old child’s welfare. The judges highlighted that personal communication could lead to positive outcomes, showcasing a compassionate approach to family disputes rather than a purely legalistic one.
The Supreme Court suspended a rape convict’s sentence after both parties agreed to marry. The court even asked the man to propose and exchange flowers in court.
The Supreme Court of India acquitted a man after 20 years in a dowry harassment case, finding the wife’s vague allegations unsupported by evidence. Justices Nagarathna and Sharma criticized the misuse of laws like Section 498A IPC, emphasizing the need for specific details in such complaints to avoid unjust legal abuse.
