The Supreme Court has questioned the Bar Council of India over its claim that “criminals have started entering the legal profession” while defending denial of enrollment to law graduates with pending criminal cases. The Court said such a restriction may not be valid without a clear law under the Advocates Act.
The Supreme Court heard a suo motu case on non-working CCTV cameras in police stations and noted non-participation by some authorities in a key meeting. The Court has now fixed March 14 for the next meeting and listed the matter for hearing on March 23, 2026.
The Supreme Court strongly reprimanded a petitioner while hearing a plea linked to the alleged illegal demolition of Manoj Tibrewal’s house and shop in Uttar Pradesh. Calling the applicant a “busybody”, the Bench dismissed the application with costs, refusing to hear any further submissions.
Today, on 20th January, The Supreme Court was informed that the Bar Council of India has framed rules permitting final semester law students to appear for the All India Bar Examination. Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta AIBE will be held twice yearly.
The Supreme Court termed homeless persons with mental illnesses as “extremely destitute” and “most vulnerable,” granting the Centre a final chance to frame SOPs for rehabilitation. Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta adjourned the PIL to February 9 hearing.
Today, On 13th January, The Supreme Court remarked in the Stray Dogs case: “No one is allowing us to pass the order; it has become a public platform rather than a court.” The bench also asked the feeders, “You take them home, so why let them roam, bite, or chase? Dog bites have lifelong effects.”
Today, On 9th January, The Supreme Court observed that many videos on YouTube show stray dogs attacking children and elderly. The Bench told Senior Advocate Rajshekhar Rao, “We don’t want a competition here” regarding such incidents.
Today, On 8th January, In the Stray Dogs case, the Supreme Court clarified that it has not ordered the removal of all dogs from streets. The Court emphasized that stray dogs should be managed responsibly according to existing rules and regulations.
The Supreme Court resumed its suo motu case on stray dogs, with Justice Vikram Nath asserting, “I am the master of my own court,” refusing to follow the SOP on fixed argument timings. While Sr. Adv. Gopal Sankarnarayanan said, “time should be indicated for the arguments,” Justice Vikram Nath replied, “I am not following that so far”
The Supreme Court dismissed a plea claiming that seventy-five percent of Indians live in a high-risk earthquake zone, finding the concerns exaggerated. The Bench humorously asked whether everyone should be relocated to the moon or somewhere else now.
