The Delhi High Court closed actor Celina Jaitly’s petition after her brother Vikrant Jaitly, detained in the UAE, stated he does not wish to communicate with her. The Court recorded his stance and directed authorities to continue providing legal assistance to him.
The Delhi High Court held that holding a passport and travelling abroad is integral to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav quashed impounding orders, citing violation of natural justice principles.
The Delhi High Court has granted four weeks to the Centre to secure consular access to Celina Jaitly’s brother, Retired Major Vikrant Jaitly, detained in Abu Dhabi. The Court also directed the MEA to update him about the ongoing petition and file a status report.
The Delhi High Court was informed that Celina Jaitly’s detained brother does not wish to interact with her. The Court directed the Centre to apprise him of legal representation options during the next consular access in the UAE.
The Delhi High Court ruled it cannot direct the government or DMRC to rename metro stations, holding such decisions fall within executive policy.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said courts intervene only if naming is arbitrary or unconstitutional in India.
IRS officer Sameer Wankhede told the Delhi High Court that Shah Rukh Khan’s Red Chillies Entertainment unfairly mocked him in the Netflix series ‘Ba**ds of Bollywood’*, arguing that the defence of satire is not absolute. The Court has sought responses and will hear the case again on November 17.
The Delhi High Court emphasised that briefing counsel and instructing law firms must ensure cited judgments are valid and not under appeal or review, stressing that misleading the court undermines fairness and judicial integrity.
Nayara Energy pulled back its Delhi High Court plea after Microsoft restored crucial services suspended over EU sanctions. The dispute arose from alleged breach of contract and was resolved without interim court orders.
Delhi High Court has issued a notice in a Rs.2 crore defamation case against YouTuber Ajeet Bharti. The case is linked to two posts shared from his verified X account @ajeetbharti on March 22 and 23.
The Delhi High Court today(21st Jan) dismissed an appeal that challenged the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in elections across various constituencies. The petitioner, Ramesh Chander, argued that under Section 61-A of the Representation of the People Act (RP Act), the Election Commission of India (ECI) should provide individual justifications for using EVMs in each constituency. However, the court did not accept this argument and dismissed the appeal.
