“Society Won’t Forget Us If We Don’t Take Care of Doctors”: Supreme Court’s Strong Message in COVID-19 Compensation Case

The Supreme Court stressed the nation’s duty to support doctors who risked their lives during COVID-19, urging data on compensation schemes. Justice PS Narasimha said, “The first profession that protects human life is the doctor.”

In the Social Media Age, Judges Should Speak Less and Let Their Judgments Speak: Supreme Court Justice PS Narasimha

Supreme Court Justice PS Narasimha urged judges to exercise restraint in speech, stressing that judgments, not personal opinions, should speak for the judiciary. He highlighted the risks of overexposure on social media and after retirement.

SC Justice PS Narasimha: “India Becomes First to Shift from Anthropocentric to Eco-Centric Approach in Law”

India is the first country to adopt an eco-centric approach over a human-centric one in international jurisprudence. This shift prioritizes the well-being of the entire ecosystem rather than just human needs. Supreme Court judge Justice PS Narasimha highlighted this development at the National Conference on Environment-2025. The move reflects a broader commitment to environmental protection in legal frameworks.

Justice PS Narasimha: “India Must Safeguard Constitutional Institutions from Political Interference”

Supreme Court Judge Justice Narasimha emphasized the need to keep India’s constitutional institutions free from political influence. Speaking at the Justice ES Venkataramiah Centennial Memorial Lecture at NLSIU, Bengaluru, he highlighted the importance of protecting the integrity of these institutions. He explained that staying neutral is crucial for these bodies to uphold the Constitution and serve the public fairly.

JUSTICE P.S NARSIMHA

Justice P.S. Narasimha, born on May 3, 1963, assumed office as a Supreme Court Judge on August 31, 2021. He has authored 59 judgments and notably contributed to landmark cases and legal reforms. He will become Chief Justice of India in October 2027, being appointed directly from the bar.

BREAKING|| “Rich MBBS Students From Private Colleges Have Obligation Of Nation Building or Not?”: SC Issues Notice

Today, On 22nd May, The Supreme Court raised concerns about wealthy MBBS students from private institutions fulfilling national healthcare obligations. Scrutiny aims to address disparities in medical service delivery. Justices questioned if private college attendance exempts students from rural service, proposing a bond for NOC with an option to challenge. The court’s inquiry will advance to the next hearing for clarifications.

Supreme Court Braces for Crucial Rulings Ahead of Justices Bhat and Kaul’s Retirement

The Supreme Court of India is preparing to announce several pivotal verdicts as the year progresses, especially in light of the upcoming retirement of two of its prominent judges. Justice Ravindra Bhat, after serving a tenure of four years, is set to retire on October 20, 2023. Meanwhile, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, with over six […]

SC : Are Constituent Assembly Debates on Article 370 Legally Binding?

In a significant legal discourse surrounding Article 370, the Supreme Court of India has been deliberating on its implications and the historical context associated with it. The Constitution Bench, comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant, has been hearing arguments from various senior […]

Supreme Court Takes Up Tamil Nadu’s Cauvery Water Plea on August 25

The Cauvery river water dispute, a longstanding issue between the states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, is set to be revisited by the Supreme Court of India. The apex court has marked August 25 for a hearing, where it will address the application put forth by the State of Tamil Nadu. The southern state has […]

Centre Clarifies: Article 370 Won’t Affect Northeastern States

In the ongoing hearings related to Article 370, the Union Government has clarified its stance before the Supreme Court, emphasizing that it has no intention to interfere with the special provisions applicable to North Eastern states or other parts of India. This statement was made in response to concerns raised about the potential implications of […]