Today, On 11th August, Allahabad High Court has changed its roster, and Justice Prashant Kumar will now sit on a Division Bench led by Justice Arindam Sinha. This change follows the Supreme Court order issued on August 4.
The Allahabad High Court Bar Association praised the Supreme Court for deleting its earlier critical remarks against Justice Prashant Kumar, calling it a step to protect judicial independence. The SC clarified it never intended to embarrass the judge and acted to uphold the judiciary’s dignity.
The Supreme Court Today (Aug 8) took back its earlier harsh comments against Justice Prashant Kumar of the Allahabad High Court, saying they weren’t meant to embarrass him. The Court emphasized it only acted to protect the dignity of the judiciary.
The Supreme Court Today (Aug 8) withdraws its earlier decision to stop Justice Prashant Kumar from handling criminal cases, following a request from the Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai. The Court said it never meant to embarrass the judge and only wanted to protect the judiciary’s dignity.
13 judges of the Allahabad High Court have urged Chief Justice Arun Bhansali to reject the Supreme Court’s order against Justice Prashant Kumar. They demand a Full Court meeting, calling the SC’s directions overreaching and unjust.
The Supreme Court has re-listed a case where it strongly criticised Justice Prashant Kumar of the Allahabad High Court for permitting criminal prosecution as a method to recover debts in what was a civil dispute.
The Central Government has made nine additional judges of the Allahabad High Court permanent, following thorough evaluation, endorsed by the Chief Minister and Governor of Uttar Pradesh. The move, announced by Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, aims to strengthen the judiciary and improve the court’s efficiency amidst a growing caseload.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that a man denying paternity must undergo a DNA test or pay child maintenance. Emphasizing the children’s rights, the court highlighted the importance of securing their financial support and legal status. The ruling addressed the significance of DNA testing in resolving paternity disputes and emphasized the children’s best interests.
